Forward by Tidbits as a public service. Please save this entire column for future reference and be able to pass it on to others in your email address book. Many comprehensive FACTS are included herein on the WWII holocaust of Jews.
Thank you, Sir Peter
(Best read full page)
Tidbits
Sir Peter Bonnell CJSJ
Bringing you the TRUTH since 1982
“An American patriotic news column for Patriots”
The truth in the news you will never see or hear on the 96% controlled world media
Please pass this email on to your friends
and relatives
Articles in this column:
1.
Comments
on Bishop Williamson and the holocaust
2.
Bishop Wants to
"Examine Evidence" Before Recanting
3.
Tidbits
comments on the Catholic Church stand
4.
Williamson
has apologized to the pope "for the unnecessary distress" he has caused
5. Michael Hoffman
comments
6. Michael
Hoffman Answers Michael Matt’s Essay, “Holocaust Revisionism” We Must Bear Witness Unto the Truth
7.
Readers
comments
8.
Hoffman's Letter to Pope
Benedict XVI
9.
Readers
comments
1. Michael Hoffman
comments: On supposed Holocaust of Jews and Catholic Church
The tenor of this article from the untrustworthy German-Zionist press is that
Bishop Williamson is about to recant and intends to recant unless new
revisionist evidence convinces him otherwise. This is not the case. His
intentions are pure. He is only keeping an open mind. He has made no decision
to recant and he is not disposed to recant unless the exterminationists can
prove their case. As Robert Faurisson, Arthur R. Butz,
Carlo Mattogno, Samuel Crowell, Paul Grubach, Fred
Leutchter, Richard Widmann, Brian Renk and many other competent and courageous
revisionist scholars have shown, the case for the execution gas chambers of
Auschwitz-Birkenau has never been more flimsy.
For myself (I am not speaking for Bishop Williamson!) St. Paul gave us the
warrant to doubt in Titus 1:14: "Not giving heed to Jewish fables,
and commandments of men, that turn from the truth."
If the whole media were tomorrow to confront me and say I must believe that the
moon is made of green cheese, it is not incumbent on me to prove that it is not
made of green cheese! The obligation is on those who assert the proposition.
This writer is forever absolved from having to believe in the homicidal gas
chambers of Auschwitz. I was a reporter at the first show
trial of publisher Ernst Zundel in Toronto in 1985. I reported it from the
press gallery in the courtroom, as an accredited member of the media. I
observed as the "infallible" Judaic "eyewitnesses" to the
gassings were finally cross-examined instead of pampered and worshipped, in
this case the cross-examination was conducted by the skilled defense attorney
Doug Christie, guided by Prof. Faurisson, who led the Zundel defense team.
Under cross-examination it was these Judaic "infallible eyewitnesses"
who we are commanded by the Vatican to believe as if they were the angels of
heaven--it was they who recanted,
including the famous War Refugee Board "eyewitness" Rudolf Vrba.
According to the pope, the Vatican, the media, the blood-drenched killers of
the Israeli regime and all the planet's leading moralists, it is some kind of
mortal sin not to believe these liars. Sorry. I was
there. I saw them confess their lies. Dr. Raul Hilberg testified at the same
trial, also for the prosecution. He was the "dean of American 'Holocaust'
historians." Under cross examination he could produce not one autopsy
report showing that anyone had ever been gassed at Auschwitz. Not one.
Burn me at the stake, but I do not believe that anyone was ever gassed to death
at Auschwitz-Birkenau. In the words of Prof. Arthur R. Butz in his classic
treatise, this notion is "The Hoax of the Twentieth Century." And
what of the German eyewitnesses like agronomist Thies Christophersen who were
stationed in Auschwitz and testify that there were never any homicidal gassings?
He gave this testimony in spite of it being, under modern German law, illegal
for him to do so.
If the modern Catholic Church makes this execution gas chamber fable a
litmus test for fitness to hold church office, as Pope Benedict XVI seems to
have done, it is the end of the credibility of modern Catholicism.
Benedict's move is an extension of the rabbinic Shoah theology pioneered by
Pope John Paul II, who "infallibly" declared as part of the
canonization process of Edith Stein, who became a Catholic nun and died
tragically in Auschwitz, that her cause of death was "gassing."
Revisionist skepticism -- toward Auschwitz-Birkenau gassings or any statement
of any Orthodox rabbi on any point of Scripture, theology or history --such
skepticism is divinely warranted by Titus 1:14. No Orwellian rewrite or
Talmudic-Vatican nullification will every overthrow what the Apostle Paul
declared to be the right of every Christian. I'll take the Apostle Paul over
the modern Vatican Saul any day.
If Pope Benedict really did act as the Vicar of Christ and the heir of St.
Peter, he would tell German Chancellor Angela
Merkel, the
disgusting jailer of writers and scientists, and the Israeli rabbinate, the
depraved purveyors of lies and hatred for Jesus Christ, to butt out of the affairs
of the Church! Instead, we see the usual servile Machiavellian gamesmanship.
A few years ago Bishop Williamson made an analogy between cutting deals with
the Vatican and the famous cautionary poem by Mary Howitt, whose signature line
is, "Welcome to my parlor, said the spider to the fly."
May God grant the bishop the grace and tenacity to recall that wisdom
now, in this great crisis, when the eyes of the world are upon him, so that he
will cut no deals and recant no doubts about "commandments of men that
turn from the truth." By so doing he will earn the thanks and admiration
of every sincere truth-seeker, and what is more by far, He will glorify the
Name of Yahweh our God, and His Divine Son, Jesus Christ.
Michael Hoffman
(Hoffman is a former reporter for the New York bureau of the Associated Press
and the author of "Judaism Discovered: A Study of the Anti-Biblical
Religion of Racism, Self-Worship, Superstition and Deceit)"
***
Michael Hoffman
Labels: Auschwitz gas chamber hoax, heresy-hunt, Pope Benedict XVI, Raul Hilberg, recant, Richard Williamson, Rudolf Vrba
Saturday, February 07, 2009
Bishop Wants to
"Examine Evidence" Before Recanting
A
commentary by Michael Hoffman on this report from Deutsche-Welle immediately
follows the article.
Bishop Wants to
"Examine Evidence" of Holocaust Before Recanting
Deutsche-Welle | Feb. 7, 2009
http://www.dw-world.de/dw/article/0,,4010109,00.html
A bishop recently
rehabilitated by Pope Benedict XVI said he want to "examine the
evidence" of the Holocaust before possibly recanting his statement that no
Jews died in Nazi gas chambers, a German newsmagazine reported.
Even as Vatican officials were working to control the damage caused by Pope
Benedict XVI's decision to rehabilitate a Richard Williamson, a bishop who
denied the Holocaust in an interview, with papal meetings and inter-faith
dialogue, Williamson told Germany's Der Spiegel news weekly he needed time to
scrutinize data surrounding the Holocaust. "If I find proof I would
rectify (earlier statements) ... but all that will take time," Williamson
was quoted as saying by magazine on Saturday, Feb. 7. "I ask everyone to
believe me that I did not deliberately say something false. I was, on the basis
of my research in the 1980s, convinced of the accuracy of my comments. Now I
must examine everything again and look at the evidence,"
Benedict called on
Williamson to retract statements he made about the Holocaust The pope had demanded
Williamson unequivocally distance himself statements he made in an interview
with Swedish television in which he said only up to 300,000 .(NOTE: See Tidbits: (6) from Bail-0uts &
Finally the Catholic Church….below for truth on this) Jews were murdered in Nazi
concentration camps. Historians put the figure at 6 million. (NOTE: See Tidbits: (6) from Bail-0uts & Finally
the Catholic Church….below for truth on this)
Williamson
has apologized to the pope "for the unnecessary distress" he has
caused him but has not apologized to Jews. The Vatican has said Benedict was
not aware of the statements Williamson made two days before the excommunication
was lifted. Italian priest also denies extent of Holocaust The
ultra-traditionalist Roman Catholic group Society of Saint Pius X (SSPX), of
which Williamson is a member, has expelled an Italian priest who said he
believed gas chambers at Nazi death camps were only used to
"disinfect" inmates. SSPX's Italian branch said Father Floriano
Abrahamowicz was expelled for "serious disciplinary reasons," the
ANSA news agency reported citing a SSPX statement issued Friday. Abrahamowicz
made the remarks while defending Williamson. Inter-faith dialogue to continue
The pope has expressed his solidarity with Jews since
lifting the excommunications Israel's chief Rabbinate is resuming dialogue with
the Vatican after ties were put on ice following the pope's decision to lift
the excommunication of Williamson and three other priests of the
ultra-traditionalist Society of St Pius X (SSPX), Reuters news agency reported
Saturday. The Rabbinate pulled out of a meeting with Vatican officials
scheduled for the beginning of March amid an international outcry over the
bishops' rehabilitation.
The meeting will now take place in late February or
mid-March and will most likely include a papal audience. Benedict is also
scheduled to meet with the Conference of Presidents of Major American Jewish
Organizations (CPMAJO) on Thursday to make amends, Reuters reported. Both the
meetings, however, were planned before Williamson's statement to Der Spiegel.
The head of the German Bishops Council, Archbishop Robert
Zollitsch, renewed his call for Williamson to be, once again, excommunicated
from the Catholic Church, calling the British-born Williamson
"irresponsible." "I do not see any room for him in the Catholic
Church," Zollitsch told the Bild am Sonntag newspaper, in an article to be
published on Sunday.
Michael Hoffman comments:
The tenor of this article from the untrustworthy
German-Zionist press is that Bishop Williamson is about to recant and intends
to recant unless new revisionist evidence convinces him otherwise. This is not
the case. His intentions are pure. He is only keeping an open mind. He has made
no decision to recant and he is not disposed to recant unless the
exterminationists can prove their case. As Robert Faurisson, Arthur R. Butz,
Carlo Mattogno, Samuel Crowell, Paul Grubach, Fred Leutchter, Richard Widmann,
Brian Renk and many other competent and courageous revisionist scholars have
shown, the case for the execution gas chambers of Auschwitz-Birkenau has never
been more flimsy.
For myself (I am not speaking for Bishop Williamson!) St.
Paul gave us the warrant to doubt in Titus 1:14: "Not giving heed to
Jewish fables, and commandments of men, that turn from the truth."
If the whole media were tomorrow to confront me and say I
must believe that the moon is made of green cheese, it is not incumbent on me
to prove that it is not made of green cheese! The obligation is on those who
assert the proposition.
This writer is forever absolved from having to believe in
the homicidal gas chambers of Auschwitz. I was a reporter at the first show
trial of publisher Ernst Zundel in Toronto in 1985. I reported it from the
press gallery in the courtroom, as an accredited member of the media. I
observed as the "infallible" Judaic "eyewitnesses" to the
gassings were finally cross-examined instead of pampered and worshipped, in
this case the cross-examination was conducted by the skilled defense attorney
Doug Christie, guided by Prof. Faurisson, who led the Zundel defense team.
Under cross-examination it was these Judaic "infallible eyewitnesses"
who we are commanded by the Vatican to believe as if they were the angels of
heaven--it was they who recanted,
including the famous War Refugee Board "eyewitness" Rudolf Vrba.
According to the pope, the Vatican, the media, the
blood-drenched killers of the Israeli regime and all the planet's leading
moralists, it is some kind of mortal sin not to believe these liars. Sorry. I
was there. I saw them confess their lies. Dr. Raul Hilberg testified at the
same trial, also for the prosecution. He was the "dean of American
'Holocaust' historians." Under cross examination he could produce not one
autopsy report showing that anyone had ever been gassed at Auschwitz. Not one.
Burn me at the stake, but I do not believe that anyone was
ever gassed to death at Auschwitz-Birkenau. In the words of Prof. Arthur R.
Butz in his classic treatise, this notion is "The Hoax of the Twentieth
Century." And what of the German eyewitnesses like agronomist Thies
Christophersen who were stationed in Auschwitz and testify that there were
never any homicidal gassings? He gave this testimony in spite of it being,
under modern German law, illegal for him to do so.
If the modern Catholic Church makes this execution gas
chamber fable a litmus test for fitness to hold church office, as Pope Benedict
XVI seems to have done, it is the end of the credibility of modern Catholicism.
Benedict's move is an extension of the rabbinic Shoah theology pioneered by
Pope John Paul II, who "infallibly" declared as part of the
canonization process of Edith Stein, who became a Catholic nun and died
tragically in Auschwitz, that her cause of death was "gassing."
Revisionist skepticism -- toward Auschwitz-Birkenau gassings
or any statement of any Orthodox rabbi on any point of Scripture, theology or
history --such skepticism is divinely warranted by Titus 1:14. No Orwellian
rewrite or Talmudic-Vatican nullification will every overthrow what the Apostle
Paul declared to be the right of every Christian. I'll take the Apostle Paul
over the modern Vatican Saul any day.
If Pope Benedict really did act as the Vicar of Christ and
the heir of St. Peter, he would tell German Chancellor Angela Merkel, the
disgusting jailer of writers and scientists, and the Israeli rabbinate, the
depraved purveyors of lies and hatred for Jesus Christ, to butt out of the
affairs of the Church! Instead, we see the usual servile Machiavellian
gamesmanship.
A few years ago Bishop Williamson made an analogy between
cutting deals with the Vatican and the famous cautionary poem by Mary Howitt,
whose signature line is, "Welcome to my parlor, said the spider to the
fly."
May God grant the bishop the grace and tenacity to recall
that wisdom now, in this great crisis, when the eyes of the world are upon him,
so that he will cut no deals and recant no doubts about "commandments of
men that turn from the truth." By so doing he will earn the thanks and
admiration of every sincere truth-seeker, and what is more by far, He will
glorify the Name of Yahweh our God, and His Divine Son, Jesus Christ.
Michael Hoffman - www.RevisionistHistory.org
(Hoffman is a former reporter for the New York bureau of the Associated Press
and the author of "Judaism Discovered: A Study of the Anti-Biblical
Religion of Racism, Self-Worship, Superstition and Deceit)"
***
Michael Hoffman
Labels: Auschwitz gas chamber hoax, heresy-hunt, Pope Benedict XVI, Raul Hilberg, recant, Richard Williamson, Rudolf Vrba
3. (6.)
FINALLY THE CATHOLIC CHURCH has stopped somewhat from being “Politically Correct” again as they and the International Red Cross did just after WWII when they both signed statements that although they were allowed in the German internment camps all throughout WWII that housed communists in Germany that there were never any so called “Gas Ovens”. Actually there never were anywhere near 6 million Jews in Germany or all its occupied territory nor from 1938 thru the end of the war in Germany on May 8, 1945, in fact there were less than 1 million Jews in all of Germany and most left to other countries after Hitler took over and started to incarcerate all communists. There are some 241,000 Jews missing and most had been sent to Madagascar by Hitler or fled to other countries such as the Soviet Union, England, United States, etc., others died of disease, allied bombing of Germany, shot for shooting Germans as part of “communist resistance movements” such as the “French Resistance” and others who claimed to have killed 250,000 German military.
In all my studies for 25 years I have never seen a picture of a starving prisoner with a German soldier in it: but the voice on the Jewish controlled TV is telling you this was under the Germans.
Every Soviet prisoner that was in the camps was sent by the Soviets to Siberia in the Soviet Union or shot claiming they were traitors for surrendering even though many of them were wounded and had no choice.
Historians realize that when the Jews in early 1946 decided to spread the “Gas Oven” and “6 million gassed” theory to gain world support and world sorrow for them and be able to extort millions of dollars by it; could not allow prisoners who were in the camps to disclaim the “Gas Oven Theory” Spotlight newspaper in Washington D.C. for years every week printed the names of living Jews that the Soviets and Jewish agencies claimed to have been gassed.
All the supposed gas ovens just happen to be in the Soviet sector. (All of the Soviet Union was Jewish controlled under communism starting with Lenin-all communism was started and run by Zionist Jews since its beginning, all over the world where it exists: take them out of communism and there is none. Zionist Judaism and communism are synonymous). In addition, if you read any American magazine, Time, Life, Look, that were the big ones at that time, from the end of the war in Germany, May 8, 1945 thru the end of 1945 (7 months) when all these magazine reporters were in Germany and the internment camps you cannot find ANY mention of “Gas Ovens” in any of them. The first mention to my knowledge was Feb. 1946 and by the Soviets and in only the Soviet sector.
Now many of the politically astute Catholic’s who left the church may return now that the church is allowing the truth to be expressed again.
Perhaps now Priests and many patriotic Protestant Ministers also will read John 8:23 thru 44 from the pulpit where JESUS speaks to the Jews (Pharisees)-those we call Jews today are Pharisees and tells us they are the devils on this earth.
Benjamin H. Freedman, Jewish Historian-Researcher-Scholar, From “Common Sense” P 2-1-53 and 5-1-59:”This big lie” technique is brainwashing United States Christian into believing that JESUS CHRIST was “King of the Jews”, in the sense that so-called “Jews” today call themselves “Jews”. This reference was first made in English translation of the Old and New Testaments, centuries before the so-called Jews high-jacked the word Jew in the 18th A.D. century to palm themselves off on the Christian world as having a kinship with JESUS CHRIST. This alleged kinship comes from the myth of their common ancestry with the so-called “Jews” of the Holy Land in the Old Testament history, a fiction based on fable.”
The first time jews are mentioned in the Bible, is in 2nd Kings 16:6(and then only
in translations revised in the eighteenth century) where we find Israel was at war
with the jews and drove the jews from Elath . END
Claiming the Jews are the “Chosen People” is
false… the Israelites are the chosen people who are not Jews but the
Christians of today. Also in this writing of John mentioned above the Pharisees
admit they cannot be the Israelites as in John 8:33 they say “and were never in
bondage to any man”. Everyone knows that the Israelites were in captivity in
Egypt and Moses lead them out of captivity. The Israelites then went to what is
now known as Europe and settled there.
These people were Caucasian and the Pharisees where mainly gypsies (mixture of Finn &Turk)“Khazar’s” of the Khazar Empire of Eastern Europe which converted to Judaism which is the 13th Tribe mainly wiped out by Genghis Khan and those that were not migrated to Poland and formed Western Jewry.
What’s the connection…the Federal Reserve is a private corporation not in anyway controlled by the government, it and practically every Bank, Insurance & Oil Companies, TV & Radio station, Hollywood, Major Newspaper and News Magazine, Radio, Military Complex. Large Corporations including the Auto Industries are all owned and controlled by these international Zionist Jews who do not believe in GOD or an after life. Are you starting to get the picture? I realize this is different than you have heard for years, but don't take my word for it, check it out!!
*Sir Peter Bonnell is an American who was Knighted in 1977 for "an outstanding fight against world communism". He was promoted to Commander & Brig. Gen. in 1978, served as Ambassador 1978 - 1980, appointed as Chairman of the Ohio Governor's Export Council to Central America in 1982 and also raised and delivered free medical supplies to those fighting the communists in Nicaragua during that time. His political writings are distributed to news services in the U. S. and other countries. www.tidbitsnews.com
18 comments:
James said...
In 1944 Anthony McAuliffe, a commissioned officer in the Army of
the United States of America, when faced with a demand to surrender the troops
to the Zionist collaborating Nazis replies: "NUTS." He is
subsequently praised and made a great hero. Years later he will be largely
forgotten.
Fast Forward.
In 2008 Richard Williamson, a commissioned officer in the Army of Jesus Christ,
when faced with a "demand" to surrender the truth to the Zionist Six
Million Holocaust Myth replies with a few more words, but which convey the same
message: "NUTS." He is subsequently calumniated and made a great
villain. Years later he will be ...(?)....
JBP
Boanerges said...
How pure are the intentions of Williamson? If he was so pure he
would refuse the lifting of his excommunication altogether. If he was so pure
he would not recognize the Novus anti-Church as the One, Holy, Catholic, and
Apostolic Church. The Novus Monstrosity has no authority to bind or loose in
Heaven or on Earth. What validity could the supposedly traditionalist
Williamson see in the Anti-pope Benedict lifting his excommunication? This
whole situation smells like a set-up.
"For what participation hath justice with iniquity? What society is there
between light and darkness? And what agreement with Christ and Belial? or what
part hath the faithful with the infidel? And what agreement hath the temple of
God with Idols?" The Second Epistle of Paul to the Corinthians 6:14-16
Maybe the plan from the beginning was to use Williamson to make the
"execution gas chamber fable a litmus test for fitness to hold church
office."
"It is the end of the credibility of modern Catholicism." I thought
it lost all credibility 40 years ago.
Just because Williamson parrots the revisionist party line doesn't make him a
folk-hero.
Anonymous said...
As a long time non-believer in the "unholyhoax", I can't
see how anyone could possibly believe in the so-called jewish holocaust.
I'm sure that many non-Americans don't believe it or even care about it and
would say so if speaking out wouldn't put them in jail.
What excuse does an American have?
arthunglow said...
allow the general public and leaders of every nation to reopen the
court documents on the persecution of the jews in germany. with all the
forensic technology we have now and instruments to determine if the grounds
have every been disrupted for mass burials, we can truly know now what has
happened . . if Israel has nothing to hide then its obvious that they will
reopen the documents since its the honest truth about their own people. until
that happens people like the bishop in Rome will create doubt in the minds of
many individuals throughout the world. so lets go Israel ! prove to this bishop
he is liar and does not deserve to ever doubt the persecution of the jews in
Germany !
Anonymous said...
The Holocaust Hoax demonstrates the incredibly brazen lying nature
of organized Judaism. To lie like that, to con children into revering the
Holocaust museums, is the most sickening thing I can think of.
This force that is behind the Holocaust lies is also behind the 9/11 attacks.
The purpose of both is to trick us into perpetual wars on behalf of Israel.
When I think about the brave and courageous people who risk their lives trying
to bring food and medical supplies via boats to Gaza, and contrast that with
the cowardly and lying nature of the Holocaust icons, such as Elie Wiesel,
Simon Wiesenthal and all the rest -- you would never see Holocaust figures
risking their lives for peace or acting in a friendly way toward Palestinians
-- instead, they are always calling for war on behalf of Israel as one of the
"lessons" we must learn from the Holocaust.
These liars financially control all of our media and politicians. The world
needs to fight back, and they need to do so by studying the life of Jesus
Christ and applying His principles.
Anonymous said...
It's a little disingenuous to claim that there were no autopsy
reports for these victims who were gassed. First, they were moved to crematoria
were the bodies were reduced to ashes at high heat. What was there left to
autopsy? Second, who was there to do autopsies? Certainly not the Germans who
were committing these atrocities they knew what they were doing and had no use
for autopsies to determine cause of death. Third, there is no shortage of
photos of these crematoria with there victims hanging out or inside. There are
even videos of over flights of Auschwitz with the crematoria visible. Fourth
there is the eyewitness testimony of US soldiers who liberated the place. Fifth
there is the testimony of neighbors who lived nearby who saw and smelled this
awful smoke 24 hours a day. Sixth there is the well documented production of
the poison gas Zyklon B by IG Farben and BASF with production records.
While the numbers who were gassed can be questioned by anybody (only
legitimately by examining the documented evidence.) To claim that nobody was
gassed is patently ridiculous on the face. ridiculous.
R
Anonymous said...
Well, this is my Catholic Church for you in the 20th century. The
entire world is 'going to hell in a hand basket' while controversies and
"inconvenient truths" regarding one Bishop Williamson take center
stage which causes the Church's Hierarchy to "wake up" and "take
action"!
Sacred Scripture has it "Do not CONTRADICT the truth; rather blush for
your own ignorance. Do not be ashamed to confess your sins; do not strive
against the current of a river. DO NOT GROVEL to a foolish man, DO NOT show
partiality to a man of influence. Fight to the death for TRUTH, and the Lord
God will war on your side." - Ecclesiasticus 4:25-28
Bishop Williamson, whether he knows it or not, will be okay. All of this is but
a replay of what happened to one St. Athanasius during the time of the Arian
heresy throughout the Church.
The Arian heresy holding Bishops of the Church stripped Bishop Athanasius of
his Episcopal powers and standing in the Church and banished him off to exile.
During his journey to exile, both Christ Jesus and His Mother, the Blessed
Virgin Mary, appeared to the now apparently 'defrocked' Bishop Athanasius, and
the two of Them PERSONALLY gave Bishop Athanasius BACK his Bishop's vestments,
mitre and staff.
So this uproar over Bishop Williamson is but yet another 'Dog and Pony Show' in
the history of the life of the Church. "Been there, seen that
before."
One Father Nicholas Gruner got his 'Bishop Williamson's Treatment' sometime ago
in calling for the release of the Third Secret of Fatima as well as for the
public and solemn Collegial Consecration of Russia to the Immaculate Heart of
Christ Jesus' Own Mother per her 1917 A.D. Fatima, Portugal Apparitions,
Instructions and Messages. See?
http://www.fatima.org/news/newsviews/1pager.asp
Well, IF 'The Holocaust' is to be made out to be the single greatest crime
against Humanity our World has ever seen, then the Masonic Vatican Prelates
holed up in the Vatican precincts and who are in charge of the Vatican Bank and
the Vatican's financial holdings and assets throughout our now suffering and
spiritually dying World can call for the public prosecution and character
assassination of those who were responsible for the FINANCING OF HILTER into
power.
Please tell these 'offended Rabbis' to send a copy of this book to the Pope and
the Vatican Hierarchy:
"Who Financed Hitler: The Secret Funding of Hitler's Rise to Power
1919-1933" @
http://www.amazon.com/Who-Financed-Hitler-Funding-1919-1933/dp/0671760831
And then, might the Vatican get around to advising the members of the Catholic
Church here in the United States of America all about the PRIVATE OWNERS of the
Federal Reserve Bank who own and run these United States? Thank you!
And for the GERMAN Bishops who so terribly dislike this ENGLISH Bishop, history
does repeat itself. For it was the ENGLISH Bishops pressured by the King of
England to call for the 'excommunication' of one St. Joan of Arc so as to have
BURNED at the stake.
We Catholics really and truly do know how to treat one another now, don't we?
- Fr. Joseph
Joe said...
I subscribe to NO religion so read what I have to say very
carefully:
Do not prematurely condemn the Pope. (Hopefully, certain people are not reading
this.)
Does one REALLY think the Pope did not know about the Bishop's stance on the
"Shoah"? For the Pope not to have known he should also be rightfully
accused of not knowing the church he is the head of is based on a unique belief
in Christianity.
So, what possible motive could the Pope have for lifting the Bishop's prior
excommunication from the church and also knowing about his stance on Shoah?
Think about this for a moment: What if the German Pope actually loves his
"German" heritage so much that he wants to put an end to this whole
Holocaust Industry (with its ongoing reparations crime of the century)?
What if the Pope wants this "global discussion" to go on precisely
because it might clear the air for both Germany and the world, not to mention
the gigantic lie perpetrated by the Talmudic "leaders" of world
Jewry.
Lets face it -- this is a BIG news story: what better way of putting the stamp
of legitimacy on this topic than having a Bishop being reinstated to the flock,
with the type of "baggage" he brings to the "hen house"?
I may be absolutely wrong in this matter but think for a moment -- THE
UNEXPECTED CONSEQUENCES this could bring to a world, ripe for "the
chosen" to take over... --jws
Anonymous said...
Thank you Michael. It seems
that "Israelites" (Tidbits Note: Jews ARE NOT THE ISRAELITES
they are the Pharisees who Jesus called the devils on earth)) would
rather stab their own in the back than fight the enemies of Truth. The Messiah
remarked "those who don't oppose us are with us"....yet some when
presented the opportunity to support a Brave soul will aver that the Almighty
is schizophrenic...admonishing the "jews"{how'd they get there?} in
the Old Testament to follow his instructions in the Promised Land. It is truly
amazing how some will adjudicate themselves, with their own mouths. See -Pipes,
from Genesis to Revelation. God Save America, Again. By and By....Tony. see
apfn message board. Irony and Truth
Anonymous said...
"There are even videos of over flights of Auschwitz with the
crematoria visible. Fourth there is the eyewitness testimony of US soldiers who
liberated the place."
I hate to burst the bubble of your lie, but it was the Red Army who liberated
all the, supposed, "death" camps like Auschwitz. For you to claim
that US soldiers liberated Auschwitz is the grossest misunderstanding of
history. If you can't get this single fact of history correct, why should we
believe any of your other "points"?
I think it far more likely that the "horrors" attributed to the NSDAP
in Poland is an example of "History being written by the winners!"
Could, just maybe, the deaths of Jews in Eastern Europe been committed by the
USSR?
Anonymous said...
Dear Joe,
If, as you say, you subscribe to NO religion, then why on earth are you
weighing in with your opinions here, since you have NO vested interest in
seeing JUSTICE done to both one Bishop Williamson, one Catholic Church, one
Apostolic Faith.
However, if you wish to purse the welfare and well-being of the Human Race of
which you ARE a part of, then you are REQUIRED to seek after every manner of
TRUTH - be that religious 'truth', 'scientific' truth, 'medical' truth,
'economic and financial' truth.
For WITHOUT Truth there can be no REAL Justice. And without REAL Justice, there
can be no REAL Charity and Good Will to all of Mankind.
Christ Jesus, only Eternally Begotten Divine Son of God the Father, is the
Savior of the World precisely on account of His Own Divine Witness to and of
TRUTH!
No Pope, no Bishop, no Priest, no Religious, no member of Christ's Church's
LAITY can promote LIES over TRUTH!
If ONE Bishop or ONE member of the Laity wants to know THE TRUTH about this,
that or anything else, no Pope, no Bishop, no Priest, no Religious nor any
other member of the Laity can go out of his/her way TO DECEIVE any other member
of the Lord's Mystical Body, the Church, here on earth.
For God the Holy Spirit Himself IS the 'Spirit of Truth'.
If we 'like' God, if we want to really and honestly LOVE God, then we had
better spiritually condition ourselves to want 'the truth, the whole truth and
nothing but the Truth, so HELP US GOD!'
- Fr. Joseph
Anonymous said...
"Second, who was there to do autopsies. Certainly not the
Germans who were committing these atrocities they knew what they were doing and
had no use for autopsies to determine cause of death."
Wrong!
The Germans kept meticulous records. There are detailed listings in the
Auschwitz Sterbebucher handed over by the Russians to German officials in the
1990s which describe the cause of death of individual inmates. Auschwitz had a
camp hospital as well as an operational autopsy facility. Several survivors
actually were employed at the autopsy lab.
The documents at Bad Arolsen in Germany also contain cause of death reports as
well as reports of execution. There is however no reports of execution by gas
poisoning. Don't believe me check with the Chief Archivist at Bad Arolsen.
The Nazis were convinced they would win the war. They had little reason to
fudge the documents.
"Fourth there is the eyewitness testimony of US soldiers who liberated the
place."
Wrong!
Auschwitz was liberated by the Russians not the Americans. Camps in Germany
proper have been shown to not have had gas chambers. This fact has been known
since the 1960s and is accepted even by court historians.
"Fifth there is the testimony of neighbors who lived nearby who saw and
smelled this awful smoke 24 hours a day."
Wrong!
Crematoria put out no smoke nor odor. The temperatures required to cremate a
human body are much too high.
"Sixth there is the well documented production of the poison gas Zyklon B
by IG Farben and BASF with production records."
Wrong!
Zyklon-B was used as a disinfectant for clothing to kill disease bearing lice
not for homicidal purposes. Lice transmit typhus fever. Zyklon-B was a life
saving not a killing agent.
There exists a Himmler document wherein he orders that the death rate in the
concentration camps due to infectious diseases must be reduced. This memorandum
was addressed to the medical staff at Auschwitz as well as various other camps.
Why bother if the Nazis wanted to gas all the Jews they could lay their hands
on.
Finally there is the chemical analysis report based on samples taken from the
Auschwitz "Gas Chamber" prepared by Gremar Rudolf. Rudolf is a Max
Plank PHD whose specialty is inorganic chemistry. He is presently serving a
jail sentence of 3 1/2 in a German prison for publishing his scientific
research findings.
Jefferson, Thomas (1743-1826), 3rd American President: "It is error alone
which needs the support of government. Truth can stand by itself."
Anonymous said...
"As a colonel in the US Army Medical Corps during World War
II, Dr. Larson was the first pathologist to enter Dachau - only hours after US
troops cleared out the Germans."
CRIME DOCTOR by John D. McCallum, 1978
Not one body autopsied was found gassed! OK?
RN
Anonymous said...
First, let me state that I was raised as both catholic and a jew
but through much personal truth seeking and research--I see the fallacy in both
of these paths. My personal take on the situation is that it was, indeed, a set
up.
I have been able to locate statements online from Bishop Williamson that are a
year old. So the Pope knew his stance when the excommunication was lifted. It
seems this is the stance of all the SSPX--as I personally do not associate with
people who have radically different views than myself--and I am sure they do
not either.
In Bishop Williamson's defense, I believe he thinks the SSPX can
"save" the Catholic Church--bring it back to it's traditional values
that were lost in the 2nd Vatican council--where they condemned anti-semitism,
refused to condemn communism and moved away from beliefs such as the jews are
guilty of deicide--beliefs they held for 19 centuries. Hmmm--seems like some
kind of infiltration to any thinking man.
Back to the set up--I think this was an attempt to get this on the stage for
the Catholic Church to be "Judacized". Because the Pope has now
effectively made the Holocaust hoax Church dogma. It has replaced the
Crucifixion!!
The Catholic Church used to focus on the killing of Christ by Jews but no more!
Now, the killing of Jews by Christians is more important.
So--now the Catholic Church has completed the transformation begun at the 2nd Vatican
Council.
The SSPX has been effectively eviscerated by this move as well--rending them
apart. Bishop Fellay is a sell out. Fr. Abrahamowicz targeted. Bishop
Williamson is buying time and trying to get the masses to research the topic
(brilliantly played by the way!!)
If you are a Christian--come out of the Catholic Church.
As for the Pope, he should really have a look at
2 Th 2:10-12 and with all deceivableness of unrighteousness in them that
perish; because they received not the love of the truth, that they might be
saved. And for this cause God shall send them strong delusion, that they should
believe a lie: That they all might be damned who believed not the truth, but
had pleasure in unrighteousness.
Seems to me that the Pope does not have a love of the truth--so God is sending
him strong delusions.
Does this call his "infallibility" into serious question?
Personally, it seems to me that the Pope has been excommunicated by God
himself.
But that is just my two cents worth!
Anonymous said...
I commend Bishop Williamson for his prudent statement and not get
caught on a situation that can be manipulated by jews and zionists to further
muddle the search for truth about the so-called holocaust.
Gotta give a lot of credit too for the internet for without it, the lie about
this particular World War II event will continue to fester and its ramifications
continue to spread more without any critical examination. Critical examination
is what the zionists and the jews are so afraid of for I'm sure put to the
light, this so-called holocaust would not be able to stand the light of truth
Anonymous said...
I am a passive holocaust believer, like many people in Europe. I
learnt about it in school, I've read about it in books and papers, I've seen a
lot of movies... Everybody around me believes in it. I've never thought to
challenge it. I recognize that really I haven't found any definitive proof for
my believing, but nothing made me doubt it, perhaps because of the general
inertia involving all that subject. Even so, I consider that any political or
historical position that accuses a whole nation for a crime is an ethical
perversion, like that pretending the German collective responsibility for the
death of millions of Jews, Poles, Russians and other people in the World War
II. I think the same about those who accuse all Jews for what you call
holohoax. Not only a nonsense, it's an antihuman wickedness. And especially if
there are laws that ban and punish those who express their natural doubt about
such a monstrosity.
For this reason, Mr. Hoffman, I find myself close to you and appreciate your
fair attitude in the matter.
I was raised in a former communist country where the holocaust history was an
iron dogma between an infinity of other iron dogmas imposed by the communist
party. They used all their dogmas in order to hide or justify the crimes that
they were perpetrating during several decades. Mrs. Merkel raised also in a
very communist country and was a member of the East German youth communist
organization Agitprop (agitation and propaganda) as a district secretary. Many
people in the communist world were members of the similar organizations, but
none of them can argue that the participation in its board was compulsory. Me
and a lot of people I know were never involved in any communist youth
organization board and hadn't got any function nor post. Only those who aspired
for high posts in the regime hierarchy got them involved in posts of
responsibility within different communist organizations. It was a springboard
for their social and economical success. Of course, they were pretty self
brainwashed because the party didn't risk having dissidents in their own files.
In what were before communist countries we have now a lot of those self
brainwashed agitprop politicians and businessmen, hungry for power and money
that perpetuate the same corrupt and egocentric behavior of their communist
past. Are the former members of different European communist parties and
organizations guilty for the death of millions of their fellow countrymen
during the decades of the real-socialist regime? No, because they have made
them members in order to improve their chances in a given society. Are the
former board members of the communist parties and organizations guilty? Yes,
they are. Because they had the power of decision and with their silence they
collaborated, participated and represented exactly what was the core of the
communist dictatorship.
So, it is easy to understand the attitude of the self brainwashed and
selfheartwashed lady Angela Merkel, because otherwise, she would have to
acknowledge her part of mea culpa in the former East German genocide of her own
compatriots. The problem is with the German brainwashed Pope. Is he also self
brainwashed - it would be a catastrophe for the Catholics - or only brainwashed
like so many other Germans? The answer seems to me a bit confusing, but we'll
see it soon.
Martin
Mark said...
With one pithy Christlike phrase the Pope could have changed the
course of history. Instead we got nothing. It sickens me. I want to understand.
I want to believe the Church isn't as bad as it constantly shows itself to be.
The Jews come in, the Church capitulates. Lord please save us, please help us.
Robert said...
One of the anonymous contributors arguing for the more or less
self-evident truth of the gassing in Auschwitz said American troops liberated
the camp. This is bunk. Soviet troops "liberated" Auschwitz.
This is the kind of ignorance that makes it nearly impossible to discuss these
matters rationally.
President Obama says his uncle liberated Auschwitz, for pity's sake!
Links to this post
Bishop Wants to “Examine
Evidence” of Holocaust Before Recanting...
(A commentary by Michael Hoffman on this report from Deutsche-Welle immediately follows the article). Bishop Wants to “Examine Evidence” of Holocaust Before Recanting. Deutsche-Welle. Feb. 7, 2009 http://www.dw-world.de/dw/article/0...
I'll Take The Apostle Paul
Over The Modern Vatican Saul Any Day...
Cites Michael Hoffman, as well as this Anti-Global Governance author. Hoffman a former reporter for the New York bureau of the Associated Press and the author of "Judaism Discovered: A Study of the Anti-Biblical Religion of Racism ...
A Bandit Gospel Writ in
Burnished Rows of Steel
I’m sure everyone has heard the astounding news that another Pope has caved to anti-Christ’s, who are probably funding the Vatican in exchange for this sort of thing. First he was asked to resign for not crucifying his bishop at the...
Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)
Blog Archive
- ▼ 2009 (54)
- ▼ February (18)
- Michael Hoffman Answers Michael Matt of 'The Remna...
- Pope's Speech to American Zionist Leaders, Feb. 12...
- Group to seek prosecution of Williamson in France
- Rabbis for the Pope
- More photos of Israeli massacre in Gaza
- Talmud was promoted/published in Papal/Catholic It...
- Talmudic vigilantes police New York with impunity
- Bishop Williamson facing 3 years in prison in Arge...
- L'affaire Williamson for Feb. 10, 2009
- Zionist leaders tell Vatican Holocaust-denial is a...
- Bishop Williamson is dismissed as Seminary Rector
- Bishop Wants to "Examine Evidence" Before
Recantin...
- Lettre que le américain adresse ce jour au Pape Be...
- Catholic blogger suppresses Hoffman's papal letter...
- Hoffman's Letter to Pope Benedict XVI
- Vatican Orders Bishop Williamson to Recant
- Parlez, Mgr Williamson! (French translation)
- The John Paul II Theology of Pope Benedict XVI
- ► January (36)
- The Talmud and the Conservative Supreme Court Just...
- Abrahamowicz to the rescue!
- Speak on, Bishop Williamson
- Hoffman's "Revisionist History Newsletter no.
46"
- CBS News' Bob Simon's Video on Plight of Palestini...
- Writers and Scholars Urge Academic Boycott of Isra...
- Lots of outrage over Pope and "Holocaust
Denier"
- Justice Antonin Scalia to lecture at Rabbinic Law ...
- The Strange Case of Barack Obama's Oath of Office
- Catholic Bishop: Six Million "Jews" Were Not
Gasse...
- Poetic Presidential Inaugurations of the Past
- Judaics cannot enter a church
- The Unilateral People
- Israeli propaganda lines for use in Gaza
- NYTimes admits Israeli policy was to go insane in ...
- Norman Finkelstein: Israel is a Satanic state
- Actual purpose of the Israeli invasion of Gaza
- Let's lift a glass to Eddie today...
- Thirteen Editorial Rules for Middle East Reporting...
- Inside the Israeli terror arsenal
- U.S. Promotes Israeli Genocide Against the Palesti...
- Democrat Controlled Congress Supports Israeli war ...
- NY Times war cheerleader urges pain for Gaza civil...
- Photos of the Israeli holocaust in the Gaza ghetto...
- World Court Claims It Has No Jurisdiction Over Gaz...
- Ghost of Bin Laden summoned to Gaza
- Gaza gas chamber
- Gaza Massacre: What's missing?
- Israeli alibi for school attack: a lie you weren't...
- How Israelis brought Gaza to the brink of humanita...
- New York Times personnel: Jill Abramson
- Targeting the "terrorist infrastructure"
About Me
Michael Hoffman
www.RevisionistHistory.org
4. Williamson has apologized
to the pope "for the unnecessary distress" he has caused him but has
not apologized to Jews. The Vatican has said Benedict was not aware of the
statements Williamson made two days before the excommunication was lifted.
Italian priest also denies extent of Holocaust The ultra-traditionalist Roman
Catholic group Society of Saint Pius X (SSPX), of which Williamson is a member,
has expelled an Italian priest who said he believed gas chambers at Nazi death
camps were only used to "disinfect" inmates. SSPX's Italian branch
said Father Floriano Abrahamowicz was expelled for "serious disciplinary
reasons," the ANSA news agency reported citing a SSPX statement issued
Friday. Abrahamowicz made the remarks while defending Williamson. Inter-faith
dialogue to continue
The pope has expressed his solidarity with Jews since lifting the
excommunications Israel's chief Rabbinate is resuming dialogue with the Vatican
after ties were put on ice following the pope's decision to lift the
excommunication of Williamson and three other priests of the
ultra-traditionalist Society of St Pius X (SSPX), Reuters news agency reported
Saturday. The Rabbinate pulled out of a meeting with Vatican officials
scheduled for the beginning of March amid an international outcry over the
bishops' rehabilitation.
The meeting will now take place in late February or mid-March and will most
likely include a papal audience. Benedict is also scheduled to meet with the
Conference of Presidents of Major American Jewish Organizations (CPMAJO) on
Thursday to make amends, Retuers reported. Both the meetings, however, were
planned before Williamson's statement to Der Spiegel.
The head of the German Bishops Council, Archbishop Robert Zollitsch, renewed
his call for Williamson to be, once again, excommunicated from the Catholic
Church, calling the British-born Williamson "irresponsible." "I
do not see any room for him in the Catholic Church," Zollitsch told the
Bild am Sonntag newspaper, in an article to be published on Sunday.
5. Michael Hoffman comments:
The tenor of this article from the untrustworthy German-Zionist press is that
Bishop Williamson is about to recant and intends to recant unless new
revisionist evidence convinces him otherwise. This is not the case. His
intentions are pure. He is only keeping an open mind. He has made no decision
to recant and he is not disposed to recant unless the exterminationists can
prove their case. As Robert Faurisson, Arthur R. Butz, Carlo Mattogno, Samuel
Crowell, Paul Grubach, Fred Leutchter, Richard Widmann, Brian Renk and many
other competent and courageous revisionist scholars have shown, the case for
the execution gas chambers of Auschwitz-Birkenau has never been more flimsy.
For myself (I am not speaking for Bishop Williamson!) St. Paul gave us the
warrant to doubt in Titus 1:14: "Not giving heed to Jewish fables,
and commandments of men, that turn from the truth."
If the whole media were tomorrow to confront me and say I must believe that the
moon is made of green chesse, it is not incumbent on me to prove that it is not
made of green cheese! The obligation is on those who assert the proposition.
This writer is forever absolved from having to believe in the homicidal gas
chambers of Auschwitz. I was a reporter at the first show trial of publisher
Ernst Zundel in Toronto in 1985. I reported it from the press gallery in the
courtroom, as an accredited member of the media. I observed as the
"infallible" Judaic "eyewitnesses" to the gassings were
finally cross-examined instead of pampered and worshipped, in this case the
cross-examination was conducted by the skilled defense attorney Doug Christie,
guided by Prof. Faurisson, who led the Zundel defense team. Under
cross-examination it was these Judaic "infallible eyewitnesses" who
we are commanded by the Vatican to believe as if they were the angels of
heaven--it was they who recanted,
including the famous War Refugee Board "eyewitness" Rudolf Vrba.
According to the pope, the Vatican, the media, the blood-drenched killers of
the Israeli regime and all the planet's leading moralists, it is some kind of
mortal sin not to believe these liars. Sorry. I was there. I saw them confess
their lies. Dr. Raul Hilberg testified at the same trial, also for the
prosecution. He was the "dean of American 'Holocaust' historians."
Under cross examination he could produce not one autopsy report showing that
anyone had ever been gassed at Auschwitz. Not one.
Burn me at the stake, but I do not believe that anyone was ever gassed to death
at Auschwitz-Birkenau. In the words of Prof. Arthur R. Butz in his classic
treatise, this notion is "The Hoax of the Twentieth Century." And
what of the German eyewitnesses like agronomist Thies Christophersen who were
stationed in Auschwitz and testify that there were never any homicidal
gassings? He gave this testimony in spite of it being, under modern German law,
illegal for him to do so.
If the modern Catholic Church makes this execution gas chamber fable a litmus
test for fitness to hold church office, as Pope Benedict XVI seems to have
done, it is the end of the credibility of modern Catholicism. Benedict's move
is an extension of the rabbinic Shoah theology pioneered by Pope John Paul II,
who "infallibly" declared as part of the canonization process of
Edith Stein, who became a Catholic nun and died tragically in Auschwitz, that
her cause of death was "gassing."
Revisionist skepticism -- toward Auschwitz-Birkenau gassings or any statement
of any Orthodox rabbi on any point of Scripture, theology or history --such
skepticism is divinely warranted by Titus 1:14. No Orwellian rewrite or
Talmudic-Vatican nullification will every overthrow what the Apostle Paul
declared to be the right of every Christian. I'll take the Apostle Paul over
the modern Vatican Saul any day.
If Pope Benedict really did act as the Vicar of Christ and the heir of St.
Peter, he would tell German Chancellor Angela Merkel, the disgusting jailer of
writers and scientists, and the Israeli rabbinate, the depraved purveyors of
lies and hatred for Jesus Christ, to butt out of the affairs of the Church!
Instead, we see the usual servile Machiavellian gamesmanship.
A few years ago Bishop Williamson made an analogy between cutting deals with
the Vatican and the famous cautionary poem by Mary Howitt, whose signature line
is, "Welcome to my parlor, said the spider to the fly."
May God grant the bishop the grace and tenacity to recall that wisdom now, in
this great crisis, when the eyes of the world are upon him, so that he will cut
no deals and recant no doubts about "commandments of men that turn from
the truth." By so doing he will earn the thanks and admiration of every sincere
truth-seeker, and what is more by far, He will glorify the Name of Yahweh our
God, and His Divine Son, Jesus Christ.
Michael Hoffman
(Hoffman is a former reporter for the New York bureau of the Associated Press
and the author of "Judaism Discovered: A Study of the Anti-Biblical
Religion of Racism, Self-Worship, Superstition and Deceit)"
***
Michael
Hoffman
Labels: Auschwitz gas chamber hoax, heresy-hunt, Pope Benedict XVI, Raul Hilberg, recant, Richard Williamson, Rudolf Vrba
6.
Friday, February 13, 2009
Michael Hoffman Answers Michael Matt of 'The
Remnant'
Michael Hoffman Answers Michael Matt’s Essay, “Holocaust Revisionism”
We Must Bear Witness Unto the Truth
Michael
Hoffman
www.RevisionistHistory.org
Copyright ©2009
Note: The following
is a rebuttal to Michael Matt’s essay “Holocaust Revisionism,” as it appeared
on the website of his Remnant
newspaper on the morning of Feb. 13, (the anniversary of the Allied holocaust
against the city of Dresden, Germany). In response to this rebuttal of ours,
Mr. Matt may possibly amend, modify or otherwise alter his essay. Let it be
known that this statement of ours is in reply to his original essay as posted here and not any subsequently modified or altered one
he may post as a result of the circulation of this writing of ours.
Michael Matt, editor of the leading traditional Catholic lay publication in the
United States, with considerable influence among priests and laity of Bishop
Williamson's Society of St. Pius X (SSPX) has penned an essay attacking
"Holocaust" revisionism using this writer's description of the case
("l’Affaire Williamson") as his own.
Mr. Matt is not an intellectual but rather a polemicist. He deals in emotion
and what he imagines are axioms, and preaches to the choir. Matt does not make
any effort at offering a survey of revisionism or exhibiting any knowledge of
his subject. He obviously regards the normative apparatus
criticus of the western tradition of scholarship, wherein the
arguments of one's adversary are fairly represented and only then criticized,
as irrelevant. He traffics in slogans. He does not seek to educate but rather
to confirm the preconceptions of his readers and arouse their disgust and
indignation at revisionists in general and the besieged Bishop Richard
Williamson in particular.
Hence, in dismissing gas chamber revisionism with a wave of his imperial hand,
Mr. Matt is announcing that it is so far beneath contempt that there is no need
to so much as read ten pages of the research of Arthur Butz PhD, Robert
Faurisson PhD (severely beaten by Zionists), Henri Roques PhD, Carlo Mattogno,
Paul Rassinier, Fred Leutcher, Germar Rudolf (PhD candidate), William Barton,
M.D., David Irving, Jurgen Graf, Richard Widmann, Carlos Porter, Ingrid
Weckert, Ditlieb Felderer, Walter Luftl, Paul Grubach, Thies Christophersen,
Hans von der Heide, Samuel Crowell, Brian Renk, James J. Martin PhD, Siegfried
Verbeke, David L. Hoggan, PhD, General Otto Ernst Remer, Leon Degrelle, David
Cole, Wilhelm Staglich, PhD, Ivan Lagace, Francois Duprat (murdered by
Zionists), Hans Schmidt, Udo Walendy, Pedro Varela, Ernst Zundel and dozens of
other dissident scholars and researchers including a former Dow Chemical
scientist, as well as journalists (Bradley Smith, Doug Collins, Mike Piper and
this writer), and attorneys (Doug Christie, Barbara Kulaszka, Bruce Leichty and
Jurgen Rieger).
Matt can't even spell Hitler's name correctly ("Adolph") and sums up
the revisionism about which he knows nothing, as follows: "By citing his
previous reliance on outdated 'research' from the 1980s, Williamson is
acknowledging the possibility that he was deceived by a small but vocal clique
of revisionists who make their living creating the impression that their
research is beyond reproach (even if not recognized as such due to, you guessed
it, yet another conspiracy). When his 'science' proves less than convincing,
the revisionist cites the pervasive Christophobia of the day to try to garner
emotional support for his theories."
This is to laugh. Revisionists lose their
living by doubting execution gas chambers in Auschwitz-Birkenau,
they don't gain it. The leading revisionists have never resorted to anything so
ridiculous as using the anti-Christian nature of western society as validation
for their technical research. I challenge Mr. Matt to cite one example of such
a case.
Neither do revisionists claim that their research is "beyond
reproach," that kind of dogmatism is the domain of their opponents, who
have canonized the official Allied/Zionist history of World War II and made it
into the theological centerpiece of Newchurch, as the "Shoah." This is risible for any
number of reasons, not the least of which is the fact that this history that
must-not-be-doubted has been altered by the hoaxers themselves, innumerable
times. Originally, it was infallibly proclaimed, based on "eyewitness
testimony," that the Germans made soap from human fat, lampshades from
human skin and that four million died in Auschwitz. It was originally alleged
that Judaics were steamed to death and mass-electrocuted, and gassed in the
camps in the old Reich, such as Dachau.
Reasons to doubt
Bishop Williamson and
hundreds of thousands of other skeptics, dissidents and independent thinkers
doubt the homicidal gassings in Auschwitz-Birkenau for two main reasons (there
are many others):
1. The Auschwitz-Birkenau gassings as variously described over the years in the
accounts-that-must-not-be-doubted (poison gas emanating from showers; later
changed to trap door on roofs and then to pillars with holes) are technically
impossible and lacking in scientific evidence. The supposed, ultimate technical
rebuttal to revisionist arguments was written by Jean-Claude Pressac,
"Technique and Operations of the Gas Chambers." This is the book that
Bishop Williamson has been confronted with in order to persuade him to recant
his views. Here we have another joke. Without denying that the Nazis killed
innocent people and that such killing is a crime (no revisionist doubts this),
Pressac toward the end of his life regarded the official accounts of the
stories of Auschwitz deaths by gas as "doomed," hopelessly tainted by
having been of Soviet Communist provenance:
"...the communists' grip on the main organs of command in the camps, the
setting up after the liberation of associations under their control and the
establishment for fifty years of a 'peoples' democratic' history of the camps
have introduced the virus of antifascist cant. Approximation, exaggeration,
omission and lying characterise the majority of the accounts of that period.
The unanimous and irrevocable discredit in which the communist writings are
held can only rub off on a concentration camp experience tainted by their ideas
and annihilate it. - Can things be put back on an even keel? It is too late. An
overall rectification is humanly and materially impossible. Any historical
change brings on a depreciation of this set memory presented as definitive.
However, new documents will inevitably spring forth and will disrupt the
official certainties more and more. The current form, although triumphant, of
the presentation of the camp universe is doomed. What will be salvaged of it?
Little....all the less so when the pain endured has subsequently been exploited
and turned into benefits: decorations, pensions, positions, political influence.
One cannot be both victim and privileged, with a turn at being executioner as
well. - Of all these facts, terrible because having caused the death of women,
children and old people, only the established ones will survive. The others are
bound for the rubbish bins of History" (p. 651-652).
http://www.vho.org/aaargh/engl/FaurisArch/RF050615.html
2. The second reason we doubt is much simpler to state. I will draw on a
truism, as stated by Charles W. Elliott, "Despotism in Church and State
needs a rigid censorship, for whatever cannot bear examination and discussion
must be sustained by force..."
"Whatever cannot bear...examination" must be suppressed by the
government and by pundits like Matt who serve the official organs of
conformity, whose job it is to discredit revisionism without examining it, by
means of ignorant generalizations and outright misrepresentation, bordering on
false witness.
Mr. Matt writes, "...holocaust denial, in addition to doing grave
injustice to the Jewish victims of Hitler's maniacal ethnic cleansing, has
proven itself a most effective battering ram against the Church, as
well.....the Holocaust denier might as well be in the employ of the harshest
critics of the Catholic Church, so useful is he to their cause célèbre. In his
corner of cyberspace he does the bidding of secularist puppeteers, dangling
from strings he doesn’t even see. He seems to fancy himself the only one in the
room with the 'courage' to say what needs to be said. But whatever intentions
he may have to defend 'the truth,' his bloviating requires little courage and
is easily manipulated into damning evidence for the prosecution in the case
against the Church."
Dear Mr. Matt, where did you pick up this term "holocaust denial"
which you use so blithely? Surely not from "puppeteers," since you
are, unlike the rest of us, obviously immune to manipulation. However, it is
interesting to note that you incorporate into your writing the Orwellian
neologism coined by Prof. Deborah Lipstadt, who dared not take the stand and be
cross-examined by David Irving at his "Holocaust" trial in London.
Lipstadt has denied the Allied holocaust in Dresden which incinerated tens of
thousands of German civilians on Ash Wednesday, sixty-four years ago. The vast
majority of Zionists like Lipstadt also deny the Israeli holocaust against the
Palestinians.
Please explain how revisionists, being unable in their conscience to commit to
tales of homicidal gas chambers in Auschwitz, are "doing grave injustice
to the Jewish victims of Hitler's maniacal ethnic cleansing"? Do you, Mr.
Matt, mean to suggest that if we were to give our assent to what we believe to
be a lie, we would be thereby performing an act of justice and charity on
behalf of Judaic people? It is not an act of justice or charity to lie for
anyone, Judaic or gentile.
In his next section, Mr. Matt does a little "bloviating" of his own,
suggesting that the revisionist "Holocaust denier” is "in the employ
of the harshest critics of the Catholic Church, so useful is he to their cause
célèbre...easily manipulated into damning evidence for the prosecution in the
case against the Church."
It seems that Mr. Matt is saying that for the Catholic revisionist to confront
a hoax in which Zionists and rabbis have invested so much of their prestige and
staked so much of their claim to moral superiority and entitlement -- to
challenge this hoax on the world stage damns the Catholic Church in the eyes of
the media, in the familiar process of trial-by-media. Matt’s supposition is
false. The issue does not concern “looking good” in the eyes of the world
media. According to Jesus Christ, we can expect to be hated by the world, and
by extension its media, because in our vocation as followers of Christ we are
bound to utter truths that infuriate the world-system, which is precisely what
Bishop Williamson has done. To suggest that this vocation puts revisionists in
the "employ" of the enemies of Christ is a logical fallacy and a
calumny.
Futhermore, Mr. Matt declares of the revisionist, "In his corner of
cyberspace he does the bidding of secularist puppeteers, dangling from strings
he doesn’t even see."
Since Bishop Williamson is not a cyberspace activist, publishing only a weekly
column in a blog, one might suppose that Mr. Matt has someone like this writer
in mind, in which case I would say that far from directing my steps, the
"secularist puppeteers" have obstructed my every move. For example,
my book on the rabbinic religion, Judaism
Discovered is the only book on the subject ever to be banned by Amazon.com
in the history of that company. Last week Amazon completely removed the book
from its listings; even used copies cannot be sold through Amazon. Moreover, I
was fired from my job as a reporter in New York for producing a documentary on
Zionism. My wife was chased down a street by a Zionist mob after my "World
War II Revisionists" television series was broadcast. In 1984 the
Institute for Historical Review (IHR), the one-time leading publisher of
revisionist books, was torched by arsonists and its half-million dollar
book-inventory destroyed.
In 1995 the home of revisionist publisher Ernst Zundel was burned to the ground
by arsonists. Zundel was put on trial in Canada twice for his publishing
activities. The Canadian Northwest Mounted Police seized copies of Dr. Butz's
book, The Hoax of the Twnetieth Century from
libraries in Canada. This writer's account of Zundel's legal ordeal, The Great Holocaust Trial was regularly
seized and burned by Canadian Customs. Zionist terror groups have atttacked IHR
staff members, threatened the life of Dr. Arthur Butz at Northwestern
University. They have severely beaten Dr. Robert Faurisson of the University of
Lyon, and car-bombed revisionist Francois Duprat. Advertisements for
revisionist speeches and books are routinely obstructed and suppressed, and
lectures by revisionists at hotels are terminated by the political and economic
intervention of powerful elites.
Historian David Irving, with whom I disagree on any number of points, and who
is arguably the greatest living authority on the life of the evil dictator
Adolf Hitler, served more than a year in prison in Austria for his views.
Revisionist Friedrich Toben was taken off a plane in London in handcuffs on an
arrest warrant issued for him in Germany for the “crime” of his revisionist
cyberspace activism. Dozens of revisionists have been fired from their teaching
jobs. Some are living as fugitives because their native European countries seek
to jail them.
In what alternative reality does Michael Matt inhabit that causes him to claim
that revisionists work for some enigmatic conspiracy of Establishment
"puppeteers"? If the Establishment could jail us all, it would.
Bishop Williamson alone is being investigated for criminal prosecution in three
countries.
With regard to discredit, is there any shame or discredit that ought to be
attached to the Zionist power that has visited this disgraceful repression and
terror on revisionists? Do you, Michael Matt, scruple to attach any stigma
whatsoever to this tyranny in terms of it being "damning evidence for the
prosecution case" against Judaism and Zionism? Or is it all a one-way
street in which we are always on the defensive, fretting about our image in the
media, while the Zionists and rabbis are always the aggrieved parties to whom
we must forever offer supplication and reparation? I was under the impression
that Jesus Christ gave us the power to be sons of God. Isn’t that what it says
in the “Last Gospel” of the Tridentine Mass? We demean our patrimony when we
quake in anxiety over how the Vatican and the media are portraying our stand
for truth. This emasculated weakness is what is the disgrace, not the manly
valor of “Richard the Lionheart” Williamson.
Mr. Matt states of the revisionist, "He seems to fancy himself the only one
in the room with the 'courage' to say what needs to be said....his bloviating
requires little courage..."
Mr. Matt, how dare you? Particularly in light of the somewhat less than
courageous manner in which you declined to publicize and advocate in your newspaper
for your colleague, Catholic Navy Lt. John Sharpe, who is being railroaded by
the US government for having publishing anti-Zionist books.
In the purple prose that mars his writing, Matt fumes: "...with fanatical
fixation, the holocaust denier still insists that the Jews...are exaggerating
the number of their dead...Is it so surprising that Jewish victims of Nazi
atrocities, singled out solely because they were Jewish, would take issue with
those who would attempt to diminish the number of their dead?"
It is a commonplace of history that in every war atrocity propaganda is
employed and exaggeration is a centerpiece of that propaganda. In the case of
virtually every conflict except World War II, the record is corrected after the
embers of bellicose passion have cooled. But according to Matt, it is a case of
"fanatical fixation" to challenge the Six Million icon, or to note
that in Auschwitz the plaque that was formerly displayed to Pope John Paul II
as noting four million deaths has been quietly altered to a figure far lower.
The Israelis contest every Palestinian claim of a war crime and cast doubt on
nearly every Palestinian casualty figure, but I have not yet read where Mr.
Matt has suggested that the Zionists thus engaged are "diminishing"
the Palestinians, or that the Palestinians are right to "take issue"
with Zionist revisionism.
This controversy is something more than certain Judaics merely "taking
issue" with revisionists, however. They persuade governments in Europe and
Canada to lock us up. They persuade the US government to deport revisionists to
certain imprisonment. They are implicated in censorship, blacklisting,
termination of employment and yes, physical attacks and terrorism against
revisionists. To describe these acts with the euphemism "taking
issue" is a whitewash.
Matt writes: "Must survivors of the holocaust (and their children) be
expected to agonize over the possibility that that number might be a wee bit
high?"
Notice his reductio ad absurdum:
"Holocaust" revisionism is a teapot-tempest over little more than a
casualty number that is "a wee bit high."
Mr. Matt states: "...the revisionist would still have his few admirers
assume the preposterous attitude of the crepe hanger, quibbling over the number
of dead Jews attributable to Hitler. Please!"
Matt dismisses the revisionists and a Cambridge-educated intellectual like
Bishop Williamson who is impressed with their arguments, by reducing the whole
of the corpus of revisionist technical and documentary critique of Auschwitz
execution gassings as "quibbling over the number of dead Jews."
This sort of prestidigitation will convince Mr. Matt's hardcore “Remnant”
newspaper loyalists, but I doubt it will deceive the thinkers in his audience.
The struggle between World War II revisionists and the rabbis and Zionists, is
not so much about number-crunching casualty figures, but with central Christian
issues such as the bearing of false witness, the tendency that Judaism has had
to brand Christians and gentiles with the Mark of Cain, and the usefulness of
the gas chamber tale for blackmailing the world for financial gain and
political capital in the Middle East.
What is more, "The Holocaust" in its
manifestation as the rabbinic "Shoah" mystification, incorporated
into the Catholic Church by the current and previous Roman pontiff, and made a
litmus test for ecclesiastical office, represents nothing less than the
derogation of Calvary as the central ontological reality of martyrdom, in favor
of Auschwitz. By way of proof we have only to point to the fact that no one
goes to jail for denying Chris's death on the Cross or His Resurrection from
the dead. Only the West’s most sacred icon, Holocaustolatry, is so protected.
Mr. Matt, who inherited his editor's post upon the death of his much-respected
father, is clearly in over his head. He even absolves the majority of
right-wing Judaics from involvement in the gigantic machinery of the
"Holocaust” industry that runs the gamut from Steven Spielberg's cinematic
'shoah' business, to the New York Times (which
Joe Sobran dubbed "Holocaust Weekly News"), to the Republican Neocon
types who howl for Bishop Williamson's head with nearly unanimous fury.
In Mr. Matt’s fertile imagination, the international campaign against Bishop
Williamson and revisionism is really just a minority Left-wing phenomenon:
"Certainly, there are some far-Left Jewish organizations that attempt to
use the Holocaust to undermine Catholic Tradition and Scripture. But the
majority of Jewish people want no part of this..."
Matt returns again to his conspiracy theory that revisionists are secretly in
league with the ADL: “Courageous’ Holocaust denial by even a lone Catholic on
the fringe, who thumps his cyber-chest in front of his cyber-fans, is something
that Abe Foxman, on the Christophobic fringe, will take to the bank every time,
thank you very much."
The ADL, through its paid spy, Roy Bullock, worked assiduously to destroy
revisionist groups in California and throughout the U.S. According to documents
in a court case brought against the ADL, the group turned Bullock's
intelligence on revisionists over to the Israeli government for purposes of
harassment and surveillance. But don't let the facts interfere with Mr. Matt's
fantasy of a symbiotic relationship between the ADL and revisionists. Matt's
phantasmagoria pays dividends of its own: if Bishop Williamson is a just useful
idiot for the ADL, Mr. Matt is free from any duty incumbent on him to
investigate the revisionist scholarship that led the bishop to his
skepticism.
In a healthier and happier time, this would be the
normal response of journalists and academics, to entertain both sides of the
debate and determine, through reading and study of revisionist books and
documents, whether there is any merit to Bishop Williamson's doubts. This is
what St. Robert Bellarmine did in debating the Anglicans and making himself one
of their most formidable adversaries: he became an expert on their teachings.
Had he only preached to the choir, and spewed purple prose about "fanatically
fixated" Protestants, he would have done little more than give Catholics a
straw man to knock down. Instead, his fair-minded study of Protestantism won
him the grudging admiration of even Protestant partisans such as the learned
Anglican controversialist William Whitaker.
Mr. Matt writes: "This bickering between Catholic and Jewish fringe
elements actually impedes the missionary mandate of Our Lord, which is why the
Devil loves to keep it going. But neither Catholics nor Jews should allow
themselves to become the ‘useful idiots’ of self-promoting controversialists
who would drag us all into a fight that has nothing to do with who and what we
are. We must all rise above the bickering and move on."
Here again is the intimation that revisionists are pursuing their
investigations for venal motives, in this case "self-promotion." In
other words, were it not for our doubts about the execution gas chambers in
Auschwitz, we would be obscure and hollow little men forced to enviously watch
from the sidelines as brilliants minds like Michael Matt presided over a
salubrious and thriving Catholic intellectual culture. Mr. Matt cannot
countenance the possibility that some of us had lucrative careers before we
encountered revisionism and have gained nothing from the controversy
materially; quite the opposite. For Matt, the titantic struggle between the
truth about Auschwitz and rabbinic, Zionist and Soviet lies concerning it, is
just "bickering" on the part of "fringe elements."
Moreover he says that standing against what revisionists believe to be lies
emanating from the Father of Lies, "impedes the missionary mandate of Our
Lord.” Which "Lord" is Mr. Matt invoking, Lord Buddha? As a Christian
revisionist, this writer follows the mandate of the Lord Jesus Christ who was
hunted, hounded and stoned by the Pharisees, whose modern heirs, Rabbi Jacob
Neusner concedes, are the rabbis of Orthodox Judaism.
Mr. Matt says: "But let us be clear about one thing: There is nothing—I
repeat, nothing—traditionally Catholic about Holocaust denial. To my knowledge,
Bishop Williamson is the first and only traditional Catholic spokesman to give
these conspiracy theorists a second thought."
Once again Mr. Matt displays his ignorance and, I am sorry to say his laziness.
It takes very little effort to discover the extent of Catholic involvement in
World War II revisionism. One of the most famous monks in France, Abbe Pierre,
renowned for his humanitarian work, made national headlines in the French media
for weeks with his support for revisionism. One leading revisionist scientist
was for a time attending an SSPX parish. Ernst Zundel's defense attorney Doug
Christie is a traditional Catholic. This writer is personally acquainted with
dozens of Catholics who are revisionists.
Mr. Matt: "And, according to the German newsmagazine Der Spiegel, Bishop Williamson was ordered
by Superior General Bishop Fellay to 'correct this nonsense' as soon as he saw
the now-infamous interview. 'It should not have needed a papal demand to do
so,' Fellay said. Exactly right! This 'nonsense' cannot be attributed to either
the Holy Father or tradition-minded Catholics—no matter how hard the media try
to make it stick."
Why is it "nonsense," Mr. Matt and Bishop Fellay? Because the mob
says so? Simon Wiesenthal? Yad Vashem? Majority rule? The consensus -- what?
How is the documentary record established and truth or falsity in wartime
discovered? History itself teaches that majorities are often wrong and smug
assumptions are often overthrown with the passage of time. For those of us who
take the divine obligation not to bear false witness seriously, doubting death
by gassing in Auschwitz is the only option our conscience will let us choose.
It is a denial of our humanity, our intellect and our Christianity to simply
shout "Nonsense!" at us. This is especially true when those doing the
shouting are nearly illiterate on the subject.
Moreover, while Mr. Matt and Bishop Fellay have every right to strongly
disagree with Bishop Williamson, by what standard of Catholic civilization and decorum
do they heap abuse upon him and scream "Nonsense" at him? The more he
is belittled and insulted by his own Catholic colleagues, the more the sharks
are emboldened to prey upon him.
Furthermore, the almost ritual denunciation of
Williamson for having honest doubts about a particular chapter of secular
history, renders guilty by association the thousands of Catholics he has taught
from the pulpit and the hundreds of seminarians he has instructed around the
world. And what of the men he has ordained to the priesthood, to what extent
will they be forced to share in the opprobrium so viciously heaped upon Bishop
Williamson? The bishop has been thrown to the wolves by his own people. If
there is any spectacle the ADL relishes, it is the sight of a shepherd of
Christ demeaned and discarded "for fear of the Jews."
Matt concludes his essay with a sentimental story about a plane flight to
Europe which he says featured a quasi-pornograhic film as part of the in-flight
entertainment. While most Christians on the jet were allegedly oblivious to the
offensive movie, Mr. Matt reports that after he protested to the airliner's
crew, a Judaic man with a young son who Matt had observed praying , approached
him and thanked him for fighting against the borderline pornographic film:
"He shook my hand, and I his. For a long moment we looked into each
other’s eyes...As I walked back to my seat I couldn’t help but wonder how God
viewed the scene on that airliner: 300 ‘Christian’ passengers enjoying the
‘entertainment’ on a flight to Rome without batting an eye, while the
‘Christ-Killer’ and his son stood in silent protest, praying!"
What is this anecdote supposed to signify? That Judaism is somehow morally
superior to lukewarm Christianity in these decaying times? The people on the
plane who did not protest were Christians in name only. Jesus said He would
"spew" such people out. As for the Judaic father, should we accept
his action at face value, and if so, what does it reveal? That followers of
Judaism are sexually conservative?
If the Judaic man Mr. Matt encountered on the jet
trip was a Hasidic man, there is a good chance that he had fellatio performed
on him as a baby. I am sorry to have to soil the eyes of readers by stating
this fact, but sometimes the sword of truth is the only means for cutting
through layers of illusion. In the traditional Talmudic rite of the bris (circumcision), the "mohel"
places the baby boy's sexual organ in his mouth. Hence, every Hasidic male
infant has the status of a molested boy. The media rightly exposed the
one-tenth of one percent of Catholic clergy who molested children, what do they
have to say about a religion that institutionalizes the molestation of baby
boys? This act of "metzitzah b'peh"
has been supported by New York Mayor Bloomberg and the Catholic director of the
New York State Department of Health (see Judaism Discovered, pp. 678-683).
In Matt's Remnant newspaper and
website he is prone to publish stories of "good" Orthodox rabbis who
supposedly oppose homosexuality and abortion. I'm not aware of Mr. Matt
publishing similar stories about “good” Muslim clerics who oppose abortion and
homosexuality. I also wonder if Mr. Matt would have been as deeply moved if it
had been a conservative Muslim father who had thanked him aboard the jet for
opposing the lewd movie. I'd like to give Mr. Matt the benefit of the doubt,
and believe that he would have been equally moved. In which case I must ask,
would it have been right to draw from this particular instance some positive
conclusion about Islam generally?
In fact, Judaism permits abortion and homosexuality and evidence for my
allegation is in my book. Mr. Matt is very naive when it comes to the history
of World War II and the true nature of Orthodox Judaism, yet he nevertheless
feels qualified to pontificate at length on these subjects. He is undoubtedly
influential among SSPX Catholics in America and the English-speaking world. His
website and newspaper are widely read by Bishop Williamson's fellow priests in
the U.S.
Mr. Matt's essay, "Holocaust Revisionism" is another cross for Bishop
Williamson to bear. It will add to the ignorance, confusion and detestation
aimed at revisionists. It will give aid and comfort to the rabbinic agents in
the Vatican determined to punish the bishop while permitting the infiltration
of the rabbinic "Shoah" doctrine into the bosom of the Church. It
will further sunder the SSPX itself, because it will do nothing to persuade the
sizable number of SSPX Catholics, who, like Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre himself,
are intensely suspicious of the Vatican's newchurch theology, of which
Holocaustianity is a keystone.
Contrary to Michael Matt's jaundiced and unfair portrayal of World War II
revisionists, we are a diverse fraternity -- numbering among us those who think
the Third Reich has been maligned, to many others, like this writer, who
believe that Adolf Hitler was a mass murderer, a dictator and one of history's
prize fools. I can honor Maximilian Kolbe and other saintly Catholics killed by
the Nazis, many of whom, like Kolbe, were determined foes of Judaism, while
feeling no need whatsoever to believe a lie about millions killed in poison gas
chambers in Auschwitz. The Zionists and the rabbinate have focused their hoax
on Auschwitz and this too is where many revisionists have chosen to take their
stand.
As someone who is reasonably literate on the subject of Judaism, I know that it
is a religion that counsels, permits and encourages lying and deceit. I have
made the case for my evaluation in this regard in Judaism Discovered. My Lord Jesus Christ made an even better case for
it in St. John 8.
Is it just a coincidence that people shackled to a religious heritage consisting
of 2000 years of prevarication, deception and fraud, have made an accusation
against the German people (not just Hitler and the Nazis), of a killing factory
powered by poison gas? This “factory” has been challenged by those scientists
and technicians with the courage (sorry, Mr. Matt), to risk their careers and
their freedom to declare that the execution gas story is technically
impossible. Other researchers and journalists, including this writer have been
present when "eyewitnesses," who, on the few occasions they have been
cross-examined, have recanted their claims.
Revisionists do not believe it is a coincidence that certain people who are a
product of a culture and a religion that condones lying have retailed a
fantastic tale of mass murder by poison gas.
Revisionists are not lesser human beings or lesser Christians than Michael Matt
or Bishop Fellay. We are not an "embarrassment," any more than Jesus
Christ was an embarrassment to those who loved truth. He too generated a
"scandal" in the eyes of the respectable religious figures of his
day.
Bishop Williamson has not been "deceived by a small but vocal
clique." We have no intention to deceive anyone. We have always called for
and welcomed free, fair and open debate. It is our enemies who scorn debate and
whose only "answer" to our research and our doubts is to defame and
calumniate us in the media, and, where possible, lock us in the same dungeons
that have imprisoned Frederick Toben, Hans Schmidt, Ernst Zundel, Germar Rudolf
and many other revisionist dissidents.
Revisionism is not a dogma, it is an epistemology. We will continue to utilize
this marvelous tool of historical discovery, despite persecution from
narrow-minded bigots within and outside the Church. By the grace of God, we
will remain faithful to the mission of Jesus Christ, "To this end was I
born, and for this cause came I into the world, that I should bear witness unto
the truth" (John 18:37).
***
Michael
Hoffman
Labels: Bernard Fellay, Catholicism, Holocaust Denial, Holocaust revisionism, Michael Matt, Richard Williamson, Shoah business, SSPX, The Remnant, Vatican Council II
7 comments:
God Bless you, Bp. Williamson,
and all who stand strong in Truth in the face of the jackals of "the
synagogue of Satan, those who say they are Jews, and are not, but do lie."
(Apocalypse 3:9)
Ed
waitaminute said...
Fantastic essay, Mr. Hoffman.
Here, Here!
As your destruction of Mr. Matt's article points out, the Holocaust has moved
into a realm beyond reason for most people. In fact, I've found that the more
logic you use in discussing the issue, the more vehement the opposition you
will encounter. It merely serves to compound their irrational defense of the
Six Million.
Using the manipulative emotional appeals perfected by Edward Bernays, the
nephew of Sigmund Freud, the mass media and Hollywood, have saturated our
collective psyches for the last two generations with Holocaust references
virtually 24 hours a day, seven days a week. You cannot even watch 'Animal
Planet' without seeing veiled allusions to it.
Yes, the truth is the first casualty of war, but in this case, the entire fate
of humanity is at stake as long as this Lie is perpetuated. This is not a mere
academic disagreement. If the Jewish power brokers can get the Holocaust
stipulated as a self-evident, universally-acknowledged fact, as Mr. Matt
believes it already is, our ability to defend an incorruptible faith is doomed.
Yes, I believe that this issue is that important.
The idea that Holocaust 'denial' is being used as a 'battering ram' against the
Church is textbook Talmudic double-think on Mr. Matt's part. On the contrary,
it is the Holocaust Myth itself that has been used as a 'battering ram' against
the Church for the last 40 years.
When one of the founders of modern Zionism, Theodore Herzl, wrote a hundred
years ago that the "anti-semite will be our best friend," he gave us
a rare glimpse into the evil logic that the Jewish mind is capable of. What he
told us is that the harder we fight against their ultimate goals, they will
find a way to make our opposition actually serve their goals.
As many Jewish 'scholars' have pointed out, had it not been for Hitler, they
never would have realized their dreams of founding a Jewish state in Palestine.
And likewise, what we are finding out here, in the case of Bishop Williamson,
is that despite their public moral indignation, the Jews are privately thrilled
because it now advances their goal, which is to completely discredit the
Catholic Church in the mind of the Christian public.
Personally, I have been successful in deprogramming many people who were once
part of the Cult of Holocaustianity; however, I doubt that we will make much
progress on this crucial issue until some Jews themselves start questioning it
publicly. Brother Nathaniel Kapner and documentary filmmaker, David Cole, are
but two examples; we need a hundred more like them to really make a difference.
The foundation of the Church was based on conversion, so I believe we have a
new task ahead of us. Waking up hundreds of 'gentiles' to the truth of the
holocaust will not help the cause nearly as much as waking up just one
righteous Jew, or as Abe Foxman of the ADL will be sure to call him or her, a
new 'self-hating Jew.'
Thank you, Mr. Hoffman, for a
badly needed defense of His Excellency. In his essay Mr. Matt mentions Hitler
supposedly having a killing machine that massacred 42 million people total in
the 6 years of WWII! Can you imagine that?!! Hitler's Germany outdoing Soviet
Russia in average atrocities?!! That is 7 million a year average in the brief
time of Nazi Germany's existence, whereas Soviet Russia, from 1917 to 1959,
killed ~110 million people (not counting war atrocities, to the best of my
knowledge), averaging a "puny" 2 million per year!! Despite his
protests, Mr. Matt definitely shows that he believes Nazism to be worse than
Communism!!
waitaminute said...
Fantastic essay, Mr. Hoffman.
Here, Here!
As your destruction of Mr. Matt's article points out, the Holocaust has moved
into a realm beyond reason for most people. In fact, I've found that the more
logic you use in discussing the issue, the more vehement the opposition you
will encounter. It merely serves to compound their irrational defense of the
Six Million.
Using the manipulative emotional appeals perfected by Edward Bernays, the
nephew of Sigmund Freud, the mass media and Hollywood, have saturated our
collective psyches for the last two generations with Holocaust references
virtually 24 hours a day, seven days a week. You cannot even watch 'Animal
Planet' without seeing veiled allusions to it.
Yes, the truth is the first casualty of war, but in this case, the entire fate
of humanity is at stake as long as this Lie is perpetuated. This is not a mere
academic disagreement. If the Jewish power brokers can get the Holocaust
stipulated as a self-evident, universally-acknowledged fact, as Mr. Matt
believes it already is, our ability to defend an incorruptible faith is doomed.
Yes, I believe that this issue is that important.
The idea that Holocaust 'denial' is being used as a 'battering ram' against the
Church is textbook Talmudic double-think on Mr. Matt's part. On the contrary,
it is the Holocaust Myth itself that has been used as a 'battering ram' against
the Church for the last 40 years.
When one of the founders of modern Zionism, Theodore Herzl, wrote a hundred
years ago that the "anti-semite will be our best friend," he gave us
a rare glimpse into the evil logic that the Jewish mind is capable of. What he
told us is that the harder we fight against their ultimate goals, they will
find a way to make our opposition actually serve their goals.
As many Jewish 'scholars' have pointed out, had it not been for Hitler, they
never would have realized their dreams of founding a Jewish state in Palestine.
And likewise, what we are finding out here, in the case of Bishop Williamson,
is that despite their public moral indignation, the Jews are privately thrilled
because it now advances their goal, which is to completely discredit the
Catholic Church in the mind of the Christian public.
Personally, I have been successful in deprogramming many people who were once
part of the Cult of Holocaustianity; however, I doubt that we will make much
progress on this crucial issue until some Jews themselves start questioning it
publicly. Brother Nathaniel Kapner and documentary filmmaker, David Cole, are
but two examples; we need a hundred more like them to really make a difference.
The foundation of the Church was based on conversion, so I believe we have a
new task ahead of us. Waking up hundreds of 'gentiles' to the truth of the
holocaust will not help the cause nearly as much as waking up just one
righteous Jew, or as Abe Foxman of the ADL will be sure to call him or her, a
new 'self-hating Jew.'
Kerry Ramirez said...
I don't always agree with
everything Bishop Williamson says, but to me, it is a scandal that he has been
treated in such an unfair way by the SSPX. In my opinion, Bishop Fellay has
criticzed Bishop WIliamson becasue Fellay is afraid of the Jews. The Pope is
afraid of the Jews. If the Pope and Bishop Fellay can so easily bow down to the
Jews, how can they hope to restore the traditions of the Church?
James said...
Michael,
I came to discover Michael Matt’s essay “Holocaust Revisionism" posted at
http://angelqueen.org/forum/viewtopic.php?t=24191 as a lead article. Frankly, I
am not an admirer of that site and don't normally go there, but today I did and
when I saw Matt's piece posted there I felt it incumbent upon me to get your
entire rebuttal posted immediately in the comments. To my great surprise I
managed to succeed in doing this and the comment contains the link to your
blogspot here as well. Hopefully, the moderators will not have it removed,
although I suspect they will have a fit when they see it. Good! Maybe they and
some others might get educated.
8.
Thursday, February 05, 2009
Hoffman's Letter to Pope Benedict XVI
I believe in freedom of speech for Bishop
Williamson
Pope Benedict XVI
Vatican City
benedictxvi@vatican.va
Your Holiness
Is it not true that under the Second Vatican Council's doctrine of Religious
Liberty, that Bishop Richard N. Williamson has the right to express his
conscience and opinion on the subject of execution gas chambers in Auschwitz?
Why is the Council's doctrine of liberty being suspended in his case?
Your Secretary of State has made belief in the "Shoah" a criterion for holding office
in the Church. Is the rabbinic "Shoah"
mysticism now a dogma of the Roman Catholic Church?
If so, on what Biblical, patristic and theological basis is the warning of the
Apostle Paul in Titus 1:14 now overthrown?
Do Catholics no longer have the right to doubt or question aspects of secular
history? Does the Magsterium of the Church now decree the undoubted veracity of
the figure of Six Million deceased Judaic persons, and the undoubted existence
of a mass killing operation in Auschwitz-Birkenau, conducted by means of poison
gas chambers?
Are you aware of the extent to which the Crucifixion of Christ has been
replaced by Auschwitz as the central ontological event of western history? Do
you wish to be complicit in the disastrous effects that continue to accrue from
this derogation of Jesus and deification of man?
I firmly believe in freedom of speech for Bishop Williamson. I am deeply
troubled by your attempted suppression of his rights in this matter. It would
seem that, under your pontificate, casting doubt on a supposition of secular
history is now a de facto heresy. I can find no grounds for this innovation in
Scripture or Catholic tradition.
I also urge you to compassionately use your influence to solicit the immediate
release of the imprisoned chemist Germar Rudolf, who has been jailed for more
than a year in Germany, for writing scholarly books
(http://www.vho.org/dl/ENG/loth.pdf) on the technical and scientific aspects of
the alleged homicidal gas chambers. His suffering and that of his young family
must not be ignored or dismissed. He deserves mercy. He has committed no crime.
His continuing incarceration in Germany is a scandal and a disgrace for which
German Chancellor Angela Merkel bears grave responsibility.
Sincerely,
Michael Hoffman
Idaho, USA
***
Michael
Hoffman
Labels: Angela Merkel, Auschwitz gas chamber hoax, Free Speech, Germar Rudolf, Holocaust revisionism, Pope Benedict XVI, Religious Liberty, Richard Williamson, Shoah business, Vatican Council II
9. 8 readers comments:
Steven said...
I'd be interested to see if the
Pope replies.
Anonymous said...
Hope springs eternal, but I would
not hold my breath . . .
Anonymous said...
I, too, have wondered why the
hypocrisy out of the Vatican about Bp. Williamson's opinions on the Holocaust,
considering that the Pope made a "pilgrimage" to the U.N. last year
and spoke glowingly of the UN's "Declaration of the Rights of Man."
Those rights include freedom of conscience and freedom of speech, don't they?
Or do they just refer to a woman's "freedom to choose," since I
noticed that the Pope did not speak out against abortion in his speech to the
U.N. Although he did speak of "universal brotherhood" to this
assembly of Freemasons. Although I did not notice if he gave the Masonic
handshake to members of the UN or not.
Anonymous said...
How does it go...
"If you don't believe in something , you will fall for anything."
James said...
Another very inspiring and
powerful defense of His Excellency Bishop Richard N. Williamson, may (at the time
of this comment submission) be found at
http://www.catholicactionresourcecenter.com/defendingbpwilliamson.htm.
Let us not forget that perhaps the most incredibly bizarre and evil aspect of
this terrible and seemingly out of control gigantic fiasco is that the pope via
the Vatican's Secretariat of State directive (see "Nota della Segretaeria
di Stato" on the front cover of the 5 February, 2009 issue of
L'OSSERVATORE ROMANO as seen at
http://newcatholic.googlepages.com/OR_20090205_001.pdf)has in effect required
Bishop Williamson to lie (TO LIE -- AS IN TO BEAR FALSE WITNESS -- AS IN TO
VIOLATE THE EIGHTH COMMANDMENT OF ALMIGHTY GOD!) in order to be admitted
"to episcopal functions in the Church." (Perhaps, we can set our eyes
on Calvary as we meditate upon the anguished words of our Saviour and then go
on to hope and even pray to our heavenly Father that in this instance the
reputed Vicar of Christ knows not what he does.) Yes, in effect, Bishop
Williamson is being instructed to violate his Catholic conscience by
lying/prevaricating -- by basically saying he does not believe what he does
believe and not only that, but to do it "in an absolutely unequivocal and
public manner." To do this would according to Catholic
theology/beliefs/doctrine constitute a lie in the objective order (i.e., the
act itself), assuming there was an accompanying intent to deceive. (God judges
the degree of personal/subjective culpability, if any, assigned to an
individual for deliberately stating an untruth. One obvious reason for a
diminution of culpability is if the person stating the lie stated it while
subject to psychological, physical, or spiritual duress.)
The lie required of Bishop Williamson is to be made public before the whole
world. This lie would be an immensely huge deception in so much as it would be
an implicit, if not explicit, admission of truth by consent to the monstrous 6
Million Holocaust Myth/Lie/Sacred Talmudic Cow/Idol (which, in and of itself,
constitutes a wicked calumny against the German people) by a strict presumably
God fearing traditional Roman Catholic Bishop. It is a tremendously evil
(albeit "official") falsification of secular history which Pope
Benedict XVI appears to accept as a given uncontestable fact -- as though
written infallibly in stone.
The ever continuing and ever increasing massive and downright criminal 6
Million Holohoax/Shoah indoctrination of millions, if not billions, of people
worldwide along with the often concurrent and never ending coercive monetary
reparations for "Holocaust Survivors" (Ain't no business like Shoah
business!) by the Judaic powers to be and their ever willing and or cowed
gentile lackeys is truly mind boggling. (Even if Bishop Williamson's Holocaust
views were completely erroneous -- which they most definitely are not -- if he
sincerely believes them in good faith, it would still constitute a violation of
conscience to renounce them -- something strictly forbidden by Catholic
doctrine. The Catechism of the Catholic Church, for instance, clearly states in
Paragraph 1790: "A human being must always obey the certain judgment of
his conscience. If he were deliberately to act against it, he would condemn
himself." (http://www.vatican.va/archive/catechism/p3s1c1a6.htm#IV) It
goes without saying that for a properly informed rationale Catholic to
deliberately lie is to at one and the same time violate his conscience.
Furthermore, the same catechism in Paragraph 1789 states one of the most basic
of all Christian truths: "One may never do evil so that good may result
from it;" The same paragraph goes on to state that "charity always
proceeds by way of respect for one's neighbor and his conscience: 'Thus sinning
against your brethren and wounding their conscience . . . you sin against
Christ.' [1 Cor 8:12] Therefore 'it is right not to . . . do anything that
makes your brother stumble [Rom 14:21].'"
(http://www.vatican.va/archive/catechism/p3s1c1a6.htm#IV)
Let us reflect for a moment on the preceding words/admonishment from this
official universal Catechism of the Catholic Church (CCC) in the context of the
draconian demand placed upon Bishop Williamson. Is not Bishop Williamson being
given a requirement to do evil (violate his conscience by lying) so that a
supposed good may result from it? Then again, if, as the above paragraph from
the CCC states, "charity always proceeds by way of respect for one's
neighbor and his conscience" how in the world is the mandate from the
Vatican to Bishop Williamson charitable?! No, the directive is actually
uncharitable to the nth degree in so far as it does anything but respect Bishop
Williamson's conscience; and as such it causes an incredible scandal, in and of
itself, to any properly informed Catholic, not to mention a vast multitude of
largely uninformed Catholics and non-Catholics in general.
The full translation of the above referenced directive/mandate (euphemistically
referred to as a "Note") from the Secretariat of State (as of the
time I am submitting this comment) can be seen at
http://rorate-caeli.blogspot.com/. For the convenience of anyone reading this I
have pasted it here:
Wednesday, February 04, 2009
URGENT
NOTE OF THE SECRETARIAT OF STATE
Following the reactions caused by the recent Decree of the Congregation for
Bishops, with which the excommunication of the four Prelates of the Fraternity
of Saint Pius X was remitted, and regarding the Negationist or Reductionist
declarations on the Shoah of Bishop Williamson, of the same Fraternity, it is
considered convenient to clarify a few aspects of past events.
1. Remission of the excommunication.
As already made public previously, the Decree of the Congregation for Bishops,
dated January 21, 2009, was an act by which the Holy Father graciously
responded to the repeated requests by the Superior General of the Fraternity of
Saint Pius X.
His Holiness desired to remove an obstacle which prevented the opening of a
door to dialogue. He now expects that an equal disposition will be expressed by
the four Bishops in complete adherence to the doctrine and discipline of the
Church.
The extremely grave censure of latae sententiae excommunication, in which the
aforementioned Bishops had incurred on June 30, 1988, then formally declared on
July 1st of the same year, was a consequence of their illegitimate ordinarion
by Mons. Marcel Lefebvre.
The removal of the excommunication released the four Bishops from an extremely
grave canonical censure, but has not changed the juridical position of the
Fraternity of Saint Pius X, which, at the current moment, does not enjoy any
canonical recognition by the Catholic Church. Not even the four Bishops, though
released from the excommunication, have a canonical function in the Church and
they do not exercise licitly a ministry in it.
2. Tradition, doctrine, and the Second Vatican Council.
For a future recognition of the Fraternity of Saint Pius X, the full
acknowledgment of the Second Vatican Council and of the Magisterium of Popes
John XXIII, Paul VI, John Paul I, John Paul II, and of the same Benedict XVI is
an indispensable condition
As it was already affirmed in the Decree of January 21, 2009, the Holy See will
not avoid, in ways deemed appropriate, discussing with the interested [party]
the questions that remain open, so as to be able to reach a full and
satisfactory resolution of the problems which originated this painful division.
3. Declarations on the Shoah.
The positions of Mons. Williamson on the Shoah are absolutely unacceptable and
firmly rejected by the Holy Father, as he himself remarked on the past January
28, when, referring to that brutal genocide, he reaffirmed his full and
unquestionable solidarity with our Brethren, receivers of the First Covenant,
and affirmed that the memory of that terrible genocide must lead "mankind
to reflect on the unpredictable power of evil when it conquers the heart of
man", adding that the Shoah remains "for all a warning against
forgetfulness, against denial or reductionism, because the violence against a
single human being is violence against all".
Bishop Williamson, for an admission to episcopal functions in the Church, will
also have to distance himself, in an absolutely unequivocal and public manner,
from his positions regarding the Shoah, unknown to the Holy Father in the
moment of the remission of the excommunication.
The Holy Father asks to be joined by the prayers of all the faithful, so that
the Lord may enlighten the path of the Church. May the effort of the Pastors
and of all the faithful increase in support of the delicate and burdensome
mission of the Successor of Apostle Peter as "custodian of unity" in
the Church.
From the Vatican, February 4, 2009.
[Translation corrected according to the published version -
L'Osservatore Romano, February 5, 2009 - PDF file]
***********************************
One might argue that Bishop Williamson could save himself from lying by
renouncing/recanting his previously expressed views regarding the alleged
Holocaust, but by doing it by what is referred to in Catholic moral theology as
mental reservation. I am not a trained moral theolgian, but from what I know of
Catholic moral theology mental reservation would not be an applicable concept
in any recanting -- God forbid! -- by Bishop Williamson.
Let us inform ourselves to what should be an obvious fact. The replacement of
true unadulterated Christianity by what may be rightly called Christian Zionism
and Holocaustianity is taking place around the world every day before our very
eyes. We are supposed to be Soldiers of Christ, not "hunker in the chapel
bunker" cowards who bow down before human respect. If we were taken before
His Holy Tribunal would there even be enough evidence to convict us of being
real Christians -- of belonging to the City of God as opposed to the City of
man?
Holocaustianity is not some cute play on words. It is a damnable fact of
everyday life which is sucking the life blood out of whatever remains of the
Christian temporal order. It must end and we must fight to bring about its end.
Whether we succeed or fail is not the point. The point is that we must fight.
That is what real soldiers do!
Let us fervently pray for His Excellency Bishop Williamson that he stand firm
so as to set for us an example of non-compromising Catholic integrity and
truth. By his witness in courage let us be inspired and by the grace of
Almighty God passed to us through the Immaculate Heart of Mary let us always
and everywhere know, love, and serve the Truth!
In Christ our King and Mary our Queen,
James B. Phillips
jimbo said...
i wouldn't "hold my
breath" waiting for the Pope to allow this Williamson fellow any
"freedom of conscience"; after all: he lived through the entire
WWII period in Germany; he KNOWS that most of what is said about Hitler
& the Nazis is a pack of putrid LIES!....and, yet, still he
"holds his tongue"
go figure!
Joe O said...
Michael, I would like you to
write an open letter to Chris Ferrara of The Remnant fame. His latest writings
on this looks like he is reading Holocaust story books from 30 years ago. He is
repeating the ridiculous allegations which no one takes seriously anymore.
Michael Hoffman said...
Dear Joe O.:
The individual you seek to refute is beneath contempt. He knows nothing of WWII
revisionism and merely regurgitates the Zionist/Establishment party line on the
subject. He also rubber-stamps the official Establishment account of the 9/11
terror attacks on the basis of a single magazine article in "Popular
Mechanics." He seethes with anger and arrogance and on that basis alone
his writing is self-indicting.
The key consideration here, however, is that any attempt to engage this fellow
in debate or engage the Catholic newspaper that publishes his purple prose will
go unanswered. The editor of that paper dismisses critics as publicity seekers.
They are so pompous they will not countenance opposition, a characteristic they
share with the rabbis. Their treatment of the case of naval officer John Sharpe
is another example of their censorship and timidity.
The most effective action to take with regard to the writer you cite and the
newspaper which publishes him is to pray for their reform and enlightenment. If
they will not reform, then the newspaper and its website should be boycotted
and the writer in question assiduously ignored. He thrives on publicity. He
relishes denunciation by critics whose arguments will never be entertained by
him or the newspaper.
I would certainly debate him if the newspaper opened its pages to a free and
fair exchange. Short of a miracle of God, this you will not see from them. They
operate a clubhouse, a fiefdom, a sub-cult, not a genuine organ of intellectual
stimulation and edification.
They are also notorious for regularly praising the alleged "good"
Pharisees (viz. the rabbis of Orthodox Judaism), whenever such rabbis
supposedly oppose abortion or homosexuality. As I show in my book,
"Judaism Discovered," such rabbinic opposition is a charade. Both abortion
and homosexuality are permitted in Orthodox Judaism, as I have documented from
their own sacred texts.
But don't confuse the newspaper at hand with the facts. They are fat and
comfortable and have a cult following. Until the financial basis of their
sinecure is shaken, they will obstruct and suppress all challenges to their de
facto support for the deification of Auschwitz at the expense of the
deification of Christ, and the scapegoating of Bishop Williamson at the expense
of the uncompromising principles and ideals of Marcel Lefebvre.
Tidbits:
*Sir Peter
Bonnell is an American who was Knighted in 1977 for "an outstanding fight
against world communism". He was promoted to Commander & Brig. Gen. in
1978, served as Ambassador 1978 - 1980, appointed as Chairman of the Ohio
Governor's Export Council to Central America in 1982 and also raised and
delivered free medical supplies to those fighting the communists in Nicaragua
during that time. His political writings are distributed to news services in
the U. S. and other countries. www.tidbitsnews.com
Other
websites recommended by Tidbits:
John
"Birdman" Bryant
http://www.thebirdman.org All truth
passes through three stages, first, it is ridiculed; second, it is violently
opposed; and third, it is accepted as self-evident--Arthur Schopenhauer.
Friends of Liberty http://www.friendsofliberty.com
Information Times http://www.informationtimes.com
Graham Jukes http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/
News and
Views http://www.truthquestonline.info
TomFlocco.com
http://www.tomflocco.com/