TIDBITS
Sir
Peter Bonnell CJSJ
10/17/01
Global Hawk:
Is an
aircraft and system developed by Northrop Grumman to fly aircraft by remote
control. The aircraft flies pilot-less and has been used to fly from the U.S. to
Australia. Also it has made many other successful flights. This is a completely
military operation but tied to DARPA, which is discussed, later in this article.
As
a side note before I get into this,
which may be of some interest to you here as to our relationship with Australia,
I will point out a concern I have about it.
In a previous Tidbits column (World Trade Center-Who
is really responsible? 9/17/01) I mentioned "Echelon" which collects
all electronic transmissions throughout the world and filters them. This means
the government can eavesdrop on every electronic conversation in the world. It
seem odd with the U.S. never before really having had much to do with Australia
that now we would be working exclusively with Australia on "Echelon"
and "Global Hawk" probably the two most advanced technological
projects in the world today.
I only mention this because about 25 years ago I was
privy to being shown the map of the world, when the "New World Order"
/ "One World Government" would be established and in place.
The map showed the U.S. divided into five sectors,
each one being occupied by five different countries military, and our entire
military was to be occupying Australia
and New Zealand.
I remember it especially well, not only because of
the startling idea of it all, but also because none of the occupying military
forces in the U.S. were English speaking. And realized what the turmoil would be
like when people that could not even speak English, were coming to your door.
ATF gun registration records, of every gun purchased in the U.S. since 1968 in
their hand and demanding everybody's guns. And they would be throwing you in
jail if you couldn't produce the gun they wanted or be able to understand them.
Just reported: It
was confirmed today
by the Defense Department that the U.S. is using unmanned-armed
aircraft in combat in the war in Afghanistan, controlled
by controllers located in the United States.
How the system works:
The aircraft are controlled from the ground through
special satellites. I will give a brief description of aircraft control surfaces
at this point.
All control surfaces on airliners are controlled by
hydraulics; these are controlled by servos.
During the 1970's there was a rash of hijackings. In
order to stem these, the government later entered into a program to thwart these
hijackings.
As you know from reading my column "The
World Trade Center-Who is really responsible?" I gave
reasons as to why I did not believe the hijackers that the government
claims were flying the airliners in the
WTC disaster could have done so. None of them I checked out were capable of
flying the 767 or 757 aircraft. I surmised the hijackers were "set-up"
and the aircraft were rigged in a way to take the control of the aircraft out of
the hands of the crew and hijackers.
It seemed they were flying, being drawn, to a
transmitter in the buildings that were hit similar to an ILS (Instrument Landing
System) transmitter.
If you have not read the column "The WTC - Who's
really responsible", please go to the website www.tidbitsnews.com
and read it before continuing. It gives the reasons I came to the
conclusion I just referred to.
I was on the right track but did not at the time have
knowledge of the following.
DARPA
"Defense Advanced Research Project
Agency" and two American multinationals worked
together, to design a system that could take the control of an airliner, out of
the hands of the flight crew and hijackers if necessary. This system
could indeed take over the controls and land the plane by remote control. The
system was perfected in the late 1990's
I discussed this with an airline pilot friend who
told me the new aircraft can indeed intercept an ILS and the pilot can hit
"Auto" and the plane will completely land itself. This is the
same way Global Hawk lands, only it does not have a pilot.
We had ILS when I was flying, but
we. flew down the glide slope with physical control of the aircraft. We
aligned the vertical and horizontal needle indications, and had too physically
land the plane ourselves when at "decision height" if
we could see the runway well
enough to land. Or you declare a missed approach and "go around", try
again, or go to our alternate airport. Now it is all automatic or i.e., remote
control.
The pilot I talked with did not know if the 757 or
767 could be also flown completely by remote control by someone on the ground
but said, "that's not surprising, we are always the last to know almost
everything". In other words our airline pilots do not even know that this
could happen to them, if the reports I am receiving are true.
A well information source said, "Well you cannot
expect standard Commercial Airline Pilots to know about OPS Highly
Compartmented". Meaning its kept secret except to a few whom on the ground
can use it if they have to. "You can control ANY AIRCRAFT THAT IS FBW"
(Fly By Wire-servos remotely controlled)
This well-placed source gave me the following
information.
Many of our modern airliners supposedly are now
equipped with FCS (Flight Control System) the
757 & 767 are supposedly two of them. This means a remote control system is
built into the aircraft with a back door to the computer mechanism that can
control the servos that control the flight control surfaces of the aircraft.
A microphone is supposedly in the cockpit that even
the pilots are not aware of, that let the people controlling this system hear
everything being said in the cockpit.
If a hijacking occurs, they can take complete control
of the aircraft and land it safely at any airport. This will save the aircraft
and any on board not killed by the hijackers.
Supposedly, some foreign governments that purchased
these aircraft found out about it and stripped the system out. They did not want
anyone else to be able to "appropriate" or be able to control their
airliners.
Apparently, a foreign government that means harm to
us acquired the code for this remote control system.
My source believes it to be Israel that
"acquired" the remote code.
There are supposedly hundreds of these aircraft in
the U.S. today. And THAT presents a problem, as these are flying bombs if
controlled by the same people that caused the current fiasco.
If the government warns of the chance of another
disaster, they suspect might happen and the same thing happens again; then you
will know definitely this is all a "False Flag" operation. They are
letting it happen, rather than attack the country really responsible. That, in
this case, all seems to point to Israel.
It would
cost the airlines, that are in bad financial condition billions to strip these
aircraft of the system.
I would assume the government has come up with a way
to stop the misuse of this system since Sept. 11th, at least I hope
so.
(For a full report on many of the points I made in
"The World Trade Center - Who is really Responsible?" For all the info
on what was reported on the air controller tapes and more on the Global Hawk.
See "America's New War? Or War On Americans?" By Carol A. Valentine.
You can e-mail her at (SkyWriter @ public-action.com) or contact me for a full
copy of her report.
I too believe it is Israel that acquired the secret
code simply because they have either stolen or been given all most all our
entire Top Secrets for years and no one in our government has done a thing about
it. (All this has been covered in past Tidbits available in the website Index.)
Israel, working with rogue elements of the Zionist
faction of the CIA could well have engineered the WTC disaster. Perhaps our
government knows this but is afraid to tell the people.
Osama bin Laden has always been a CIA operative but
certainly did not have the resources to do this alone. Perhaps that is why the
U.S. has refused to agree to have him delivered to a world court for trial.
Afghanistan has said they will deliver him if tried by a United Nations court.
Why not… especially if we have the "hard evidence" we say we have.
Our government claims it is TO SENSITIVE to disclose to the American people.
Yet we are being asked to send our children and grand
children to war based on no real
evidence being presented to us. Letting bin Laden be tried by the UN
would also bring an end to all this suffering we are going through on the home
front. This includes losing of our privacy rights granted under the
constitution.
If it
came out that Israel was indeed behind it all and all aid to them was halted,
that would set the Zionist agenda back years and may completely wipe it out.
These steps, such as losing privacy, personal
weapons, and instituting a common means of national identification, I remind
you, have always been the same ones the "One World Zionists" have
advocated in advance of their final move.
But then again if we were told the truth there are
two other considerations.
Perhaps the "powers that be" do not want
Israel charged. (See -The WTC-Who's really responsible?)
In addition without the war how can we keep from
going into a deep recession or depression? ( I will explain in a future Tidbits
what the forced depression of gold prices and Oil have to do with all this)
War always seems to solve that problem. Osama bin
Laden could blow the lid off the whole conspiracy. That’s why they want him
dead, not on trial.
This would bear out what I mentioned in the other
column referred to in this article. What was the motive? Only Israel
had one and is the only one that gains
by all this.
Again see the Tidbits article referred to above for a
full explanation.
This
whole thing more and more appears like a "False Flag" operation.
Another thing I think about is, if bin Laden could do
all this by himself and had all the necessary intelligence
info, money and access to codes, etc. why not do it to his real supposed
enemy Israel, rather than the U.S.?
Why would he instead let them off the hook and HELP
them? It just does not add up.
I asked my source about what happened to the five
Israelis the FBI arrested that I knew about. They were videotaping the
destruction of the WTC and were shouting with joy and mockery, form the top of a
nearby building, he told me the
following.
"I have run the mill of my confidential
informants and what I received concerning the arrest of Israeli Foreign
Nationals and/or Israeli Mossad agents is that THIS INFORMATION is being
SUPPRESSED by the National Media. These ONGOING arrests are at present REMAINING
CLASSIFIED BY OUR GOVERNMENT and especially
the FBI. Of the over 100+ arrests, there remain an unusual and extremely large
number of arrest that are CONFIRMED Israeli Mossad/Foreign Nationals, and this
comes form the highest sources within those who are "IN THE KNOW',..SO TO
SPEAK. Even the news articles that have been released about these previously
arrested, have been "swept up" simply because of the unusually high
number of Israelis involved." End.
Also did you know that about 4,000 Israelis did not
show up for work at the World Trade Center on Sept. 11th. (Sep. 11th
was not a Jewish holiday).
Remember what my one reader said that I printed in
the article "Mid-East Turmoil" on 4/5/01 about the abundance of Jews
traveling and said, "Are they traveling more than the rest of us spreading
their "cause" secretly doing their thing? That came to mind when I
found out about the 4,000 not showing up for work that day. Some things you just
don't want to discuss by e-mail or on the telephone.
Morgan Stanley occupying 50 floors lost no one nor did Oppenhimer Funds.
Who but a large government that has stolen almost all
our nuclear and other TOP Secrets could have broke the ultra-secret White House code
and sent a message to the White House control center on Sept. 11th ,
saying, "Air Force One is next"?
Another thing that has been covered up is that
fighter aircraft shot down the Airliner that crashed in Pennsylvania. There were
eyewitness accounts. When I heard there were body parts, a leg and a
foot with a shoe on it, found eight
miles from the crash site I knew the plane had to have been blown up
in the air. There is no way that a plane that was so disintegrated
that the largest part found at the crash site was 2Ft.X 3Ft., could
possibly have thrown that body part eight miles away. Carol Valentine tells of
all the other wreckage found in other places far from the scene of the crash and
the eyewitness accounts also. There
is no use my quoting that which she so thoroughly covered in her article. If you
cannot pull up the article contact me, I'll see you get a copy.
Yet, even though it was reported that the order was
given to shoot that plane down the government denies it. There is nothing wrong
with shooting down that plane when three others had already been flown into
other buildings. A commander HAS to make decisions sometimes to sacrifice some
to save many. Yet, the government it seems is afraid to tell the truth about
anything to the people.
This would also show that Pres. Bush and the "good guys" in the military did not
know about the attack beforehand. If they were a part of it, why shoot it down?
But, with Echelon and the billions we spend on defense and Intel, some surly
knew!
There is just too much about this catastrophe being
leaked to cover it up. The people remember Ruby Ridge, Waco, The Oklahoma
bombing and all the lies we were told in every one of these cases.
I fear for what might happen unless the government
starts to tell the truth on this one.
Congressional
Record: On
July 21, 1994 (before Sharon- he would never declare them outlaws.). The
Hon. Lee H. Hamilton in the House of Representatives, addressed the House about
unanswered questions by the then Sectary, Department of State Warren M.
Christopher pertaining to Israeli Terrorist Groups. He had written on Mar.
18, 1994 In addressing the
House he said: Mr. Speaker, I wish to draw to the attention of my colleagues my
recent correspondence with the Dept. of State on the subject of Israeli
terrorist groups operation within the United States. Earlier this year, I wrote
the Department to inquire about United States policy towards two Jewish settler
organizations, Kach an Kahane Chai, which have been outlawed by the Israeli
Government. Despite their outlaw status in Israel, these groups continue to
operate and raise funds freely in the United States. I am including the State
Department's preliminary response as well as its final response. I hope my
colleagues find this correspondence of interest.
Hamilton's first letter was Mar. 18, 1994 to
Christopher posing his questions as to what State was doing about it. On March
31, 1994 answered by a Wendy R. Sherman saying "We will get back
to you quickly with as comprehensive a response as possible.
On May 16, 1994 the same Wendy R. Sherman
writes again, last sentence in letter "As the questions you raise
illustrate, this is a complex issue, especially when American citizens are
involved. We will continue to explore ways of utilizing existing legal measures
and developing new ones if possible. We appreciate your interest and if you have
further questions or suggestions, please do not hesitate to contact us".
In other words nothing was done even by July 21,
1994, and that is why Hamilton addressed the House.
Sounds like the answer you get when writing to some
Representatives asking a direct question and get back a "sales pitch"
that skirts the issue doesn't it?
If any of my readers know if State EVER DID ANYTHING
ABOUT Rep. HAMILTONS CONCERNS, PLEASE LET ME KNOW. www.tidbitsnews.com
Your donation, no matter how small, helps us to reach more and more Americans with the TRUTH in media.
Please send donations to:
Tidbits
Box 268
Cuyahoga Falls, OH 44222
*Sir Peter is an
American Knighted for an "outstanding fight against world communism".
He was promoted to Commander & Brig. Gen. In 1978, served as
Ambassador of the Sovereign Order of St. John 1978-1980, appointed as Chairman
of the Ohio Governor's Export Council to Central America in 1982. His political
writings are sent to news services in the U.S. and other countries.
www.tidbitsnews.com