
TIDBITS
Sir
Peter Bonnell CJSJ
Bringing
you the TRUTH
since 1982
www.tidbitsnews.com.
March 31, 2003
"For
what is good and beneficial to our souls, and for peace of the world, let us
beseech the Lord"
In
this column:
Why
war with
Iraq
?
Did
Hussein gas the Kurds?
Arab
TV crew finds 40 dead
U.S.
soldiers.
Dan
Rather, "I can't report the news!"
Who
are the men surrounding Pres. Bush?
Pentagon
threatens to kill independent reporters in
Iran
.
BBC
World is dropped by
Israel
's
3 cable TV companies.
US
Marine column stalled
in Iraqi desert.
Let's
look at the facts.
500
U.S.
&
U.K.
soldiers being kept in
morgue in
Afghanistan
.
Iran-Next
target in this war.
Testing
military hardware in combat- (proving weapons)
Textbook
critical of Jews ruled legal in
Russia
.
Comparative
deaths Muslims and Jews on 911 in the WTC buildings.
When
is News, News.
Difference
between Jewish people and Zionist Jews reported by a former Jewish Zionist.
Media, Media, Media: Dear reader, has it dawned on you how
childish and truly ridiculously imbecilic the mass media (and some in government
for that matter) has become lately, as too the Iraqi war?
I'm as patriotic as anyone and
far more than most, having served in two branches of the service, been Knighted
and decorated 9 times for fighting world communism. In addition I've spent a
small fortune publishing for 25 years; informing Americans of the truth of world
affairs out of my own pocket. Why, because I owe it to my country and great men,
and ordinary citizens, who have put their faith in me, I choose to be a patriot.
I do what I feel is right for my country and its people. I wouldn't give 1 of
our service personnel for 100 Iraqi soldiers.
But the TRUTH is the TRUTH, with that in mind….
I have never met Saddam Hussein
and only know what I have read about him. He may well be a tyrant. He may be
using civilians as a shield, he has so little to fight our huge war machine
with, he might be. But I have not heard of a "Ruby Ridge" or "
Waco
" or "Oklahoma Bombing" or "911" in
Iran
. Nor does it appear
Iran
ever gassed the Kurds. *(Facts on this
further down in the column).
Have our leaders not done, or
allowed to have been done, much the same and worse based on the above mentioned
atrocities, at times? (LSee
Index for "
Oklahoma
Bombing" & "911")
Often through the years I have
worried about the I.Q. levels of some people in the government. I say that
because I have been bewildered, as to how they can expect us to accept many
things they say, ….that they think we will believe. As far as some of the
reports about Iraq, I have been reporting for so long I can smell
"Bull" from a controlled media reporter as soon as I
hear the first sentence (sometimes the first 1/2 sentence). There is a
difference in being patriotic by being logical, intelligent and telling the
truth for the good of this country, then being patriotic by just waving our flag
and blindly going along with our leaders, even when we have that nagging in our
brain, that tells us… all isn't quite right. When a group of people in
government, and their Zionist rulers, steal the land and minerals of other
countries who have not attacked us, and we praise them for it, is not being
patriotic. In fact it is quite the opposite. Our service men have no choice in
the matter, for them I feel deeply.
Zionistic communists started the
Vietnam
anti-war demonstrations
because we were fighting communism in
Vietnam
. They couldn't allow that because
they started and supported communism as their tool to control the world with a
one-world government under communism. Now the same people (Zionists) still want
a "One world Government" but are just going about it in a slightly
different manner. Now these same people want us to fight Mid-Eastern countries
that are not communist and from all indications and what I have learned they
intend to continue doing the same in one country after the other; and
for what? ……...I will tell you,
for what! To give all Mid-East oil lands to
Israel
!
Let's call these people "Smoke Screeners" These
"Smoke Screeners" appeal to us…. that the U.S. has some pre-ordained
right to commit any act of war, slaughter and aggression on others as if we have
some "Divine Right" to pick and choose whom we will blow off the face
of the earth just because we decide too. But, when we were fighting the
communists..no!..no! you can't do that.
Let's look at the facts:
Iraq
has not attacked us, threatened to attack us, or been proven in any way to have
had any part in 911. (See the Tidbits Index, "World Trade Center
Disaster" series for my complete investigation and facts that bear out who
were really responsible). They keep telling us this is a war to FREE
Iraq
. At the rate we're going there will be far less of them to free. Someone must
be hiding the petitions with thousands or millions with Iraqi signatures asking
us to FREE them. From the way their acting it doesn’t seem as if they want our
type of freedom. Now, here is where the media and government "Smoke
Screeners" treat us as if we are drooling at the mouth imbeciles…they
feed us idiotic statements such as: People in the Mid-East hate us "because
we have too much freedom" This is so absurd it doesn't deserve
rebuttal. "300 anti-biochemical suits were found hidden in a Iraqi
school house and gas masks also. Some of their soldiers in the field also had
gas masks. This can only mean they plan to use biological weapons against us".
What insults our intelligence is that they think that we will never take
into consideration that the Iraqis may carry them because they
may think that we might be planning to use gas against them. After all look
at what our mighty war machine has done to them so far. If you were them would
you trust us? (Did we not test "Agent Orange" on our own troops in
Vietnam
?) All of our coalition troops, in
fact, are equipped and have this same equipment (as they should)
with them always. Being honest about it, the Iraqis should be more
worried about being gassed
than we are under these circumstances.
Frankly, I'm worried about an
Israeli "false flag op" where they hit our troops with a chemical
weapon and try to blame it on the Iraqis. They have always been
"masters" at committing
acts of terror and blaming them on others in the past. The USS Liberty, the
Lavon Affair, "911", Zionist Jews bombing of other Jewish people in
Iraq in 1950-1951, etc. Rumsfeld seems to think it's a "war crime"
if Iraqis shoot at us and run away
and change clothes. They can't be charged as a spy for being out of uniform,
because they are in their own country. I am certainly not for the Iraqi soldier;
but we have to be logical. I am just trying to show how ridiculous those
arguments are. They have no choice but to use guerrilla tactics against the huge
war machine we have there. Wouldn't we be doing the same thing if the tables
were reversed? He makes it sound like a crime for an Iraqi soldier to fight
back. What did he expect? Where did we get this guy from….he even keeps a
straight face. I think he has been around too may Israelis, ….I didn't know it
was catching. The fact is he believed the Israeli assessment of how the
Iraqis would act. Of course, maybe I'm being to harsh with him, inasmuch as a
retired Colonel on Larry King's show
3/30/03
said "Israeli intelligence had convinced the
U.S.
government that the Iraqis were eager to lay down their arms and
surrender. What better way to get the
U.S.
into
Iraq
to do their fighting for them than
to make us believe it would be a "cake walk". This is
what I mean when I talk about our politicians I.Q.'s Their either dumb or
traitors. (Of course I've been around government for so long I know so many are
"bought & paid for" by Israel that it didn't take much convincing
on their part. Also through their control of the mass media they can destroy the
others. It's hard to fight back when you can't get "equal time"). Sure
it's tough, but we need patriots not politicians!
Another thing these "Smoke Screeners" are trying to
convince us of is that Saddam Hussein gassed his own people. Much has been made of this, in fact much of the "Smoke
Screeners" argument for going to war with
Iraq
is based on it. Stephen Pelletiere, was the CIA's senior political analyst on
Iraq
during the 1980's war between
Iraq
and
Iran
, and later served as a professor at the US Army War College (1988-2000).
Pelletiere's op ed piece was in the New York Times, Jan. 31."A War Crime or
an Act of War". (This was sent to me by UAICID, written by Jon Rappoport).
Pelletiere attacks the theory that Saddam gassed the Kurds. Pelletiere had access to a lot of the
classified data that was generated around the Kurd matter. The major gassing
incident occurred in March 1988 at a town called Halabia. "But the truth
is", Pelletiere writes, "all we know for certain is that Kurds were
bombarded with poison gas that day". "This occurred near the end of
the Iraq-Iran war". Pelletiere writes, "immediately after the battle
(at Halabja) the United States Defense information Agency investigated and
produced a classified report, which it circulated within the intelligence
community on a need-to-know basis. That study asserted that it was Iranian
gas that killed the Kurds, not Iraqi gas". Pelletiere goes on to
write that both the Iraqis and the Iranian troops used gas at Halabja. "The
condition of the dead Kurds' bodies, however, indicated that they had been
killed with a blood agent-that is a cyanide-based gas-which
Iran
was known to have. The Iraqis, who are thought to have used mustard gas in the
battle, are not known to have possessed blood agents at the time." Then
Pelletiere raises and answers a very interesting question. "Why was the
battle of Halabja fought?"...
Iraq
has the most extensive river system in the Middle East.Iraq had build an
impressive system of dams and river control projects, the largest being the
Darbandikhan dam in the Kurdish area. And it was this dam the Iranians were
seeking to take control of when they seized Halbja." Pelletiere points out
that a water pipeline through
Iraq
"could bring the waters of the
Tigris
and
Euphrates
south to the parched
Gulf States
, and by extension,
Israel
. To date that pipeline has not been built. But after Gulf War 2? Would
Israel
become one of the prime beneficiaries in the aftermath?
Isn't it ironic how after you
dig into things you always seem to find at the bottom, the great beneficiary
always being
ISRAEL
? Curious isn't it?
Remember fresh water is more
precious than oil in that part of the world. The Israelis have always demanded
in every proposed peace agreement that
Israel
control the Palestinian water supply. They could then shut the water off at
will, as a weapon against the
Palestinians. But even at that, it has always been
Israel
that has walked out of the peace talks or attacked the Palestinians to end the
peace talks. The last time was when they machine-gunned the
Palestinians in the mosque during prayer. That is what started this last
round of hostilities. As I write this
Israel
is destroying the Palestinian water wells with bulldozers. (See my article
"Rachel Corrie" the young
American
University
student that went to
Israel
to stop this and the Israelis purposefully ran her over killing her with a
bulldozer).
Remember that the charge that
has been leveled at Saddam is, he gassed his own civilians. Pelletiere is
offering evidence collected by U.S. Intelligence and the military analysis that
refuted that charge. The point is, if
Iraq
had attacked the
U.S.
or had the means too and threatened us that would be different. Then we would
have had the right to invade their country. Without that WE HAVE NO RIGHT to
sacrifice our young men.
Iraq
, I would think would have already used "weapons of mass destruction"
by now if they had them. Isn't that what we went into
Iraq
for? No one ever mentioning that
Israel
is loaded with them and is the cause
of all the trouble in the Mid-East from the time
Israel
was formed. Why aren't we all screaming to rid
Israel
of all their "weapons of mass destruction?" After all, the ones we
haven't given them they have stolen the secrets of, from us (used themselves and
sold to communist
China
). Yet, no one has ever done anything about it.
Iraq
has been hit with the most sophisticated weapons in the world already. I think
the Iraqi people, that have been struck by them, would tell you they consider
that they already have been hit with "weapons of mass destruction".
Let's bring our boys home and let
Israel
fight it's own battles.
Israel
realizes if they did that the world would turn against them, that's why they
use us. They use our men, our dollars and our equipment, because they don't want
to fight any battle we will fight for them. Our government is riddled with
Zionists and the one's that aren't Zionists
in our government bow to them. And in return nations hate the Americans people
and think were satanic because our Zionist led government
commits satanic acts.
Dan Rather: Undisputedly one of the best known newsmen in the
U.S.
is obviously getting fed up with the controlled media also. Greg Palast interviewed Rather on his program Newsnight (in
England
) Rather said "I can't report the news, I'm not allowed to ask questions.
We're gonna send our children and our husbands into the desert now, and I can't
ask a question, because I will be lynched". Enough said about Media
control.
Pentagon Threatens To Kill Independent Reporters in
Iraq
: The Pentagon has threatened
to fire on the satellite uplink positions of independent journalists in
Iraq
, according to veteran BBC war correspondent, Kate Adie in an interview with
Irish radio. According to Ms. Adie, who twelve years ago covered the last Gulf
War, the Pentagon attitude is "entirely hostile to the free spread of
information." She also warned that the Pentagon is vetting journalists
according to their stance on the war, and intends to take control of US
journalists' satellite equipment--in order to control access to the airwaves
(Note: This is being done now). Another guest on the show, war author Phillip
Knightley, reported that the Pentagon has also threatened that they; "may
find it necessary to bomb areas in which war correspondents are attempting to
report from the Iraqi side." Adie… "And what actually appalls me is
the difference between 12 years ago and now. I've seen a complete erosion of any
kind of acknowledgment that reporters should be able to report as they
witness" "I was told by a senior officer in the Pentagon, that if
uplinks---that is the TV signals out of
Baghdad
, for example--were detected by any planes..electronic media…mediums of the
military above
Baghdad
, they'd be fired down on. even if they were journalists". "They would
be targeted down" said the officer.."Well..they know this.. they've
been warned."
(My thoughts: Could some of the
targets being hit in civilian sections of
Baghdad
be because of the above? Do they want to keep us that much in the blind? They did
hit the main Hotel housing most of the foreign and independent
journalists in
Baghdad
Sunday night
3/30/03
).
When is News, News: News is the TRUTHFUL
reporting of what is actually happening or has happened at a given time
and place. When you censor news it is no longer news, but then becomes
propaganda.
Arab
TV Crew in Iraq, says they found 40 dead
U.S.
soldiers. The following appeared in the letters section of "WhatReallyHappened.
Com"
3-26-3
. Samwa ata Mosahra reporting. A film crew from al-Minar TV, a television
network of
Lebanon
, stumbled across the bodies of about 40
U.S.
soldiers scattered in the desert outside Maseriah. Ail Fawsua a cameraman for
al-Minar said "it was obvious the soldiers had been in a major battle as
there was empty ammunition casing everywhere. We searched around but could not
find any dead Iraqi soldiers and must be thinking they took their dead and
injured away from the battle" he added. "We called on our satellite
phone to our base camp and told them what we had found and they told the
Americans where we were located". "Soon some American helicopters came
to us and the Americans took all our camera and recording equipment hardware and
smashed it. They told us to leave the area and say nothing of this
finding". "When we arrived back at our base to the south there were
American military police everywhere and they destroyed all of our
equipment and told us to leave
Iraq
immediately". Al-Minar has lodged a complaint with the IJCO and
U.S.
with a claim for compensation for the many thousands dollars of destroyed
equipment.
Proving Weapons: I have always believed that much of what we
are doing in the small wars like
Iraq
is testing military hardware. The Pentagon wants war proven weapons. Through
wars like
Yugoslavia
,
Afghanistan
and
Iraq
, we create testing grounds that prove capabilities. Non combat testing is not
nearly as good as actual testing. If a Boxer or Karate man just practice, he
learns quickly when matched, that adjustments must be made. The same is true
with military hardware.
Bodies of 500
U.S.
,
UK
soldier's lying in Jacobabad: Pak
Tribune
Wed. March 26, 2003
((0229 PST)
Islamabad
, March 26 (Online). Reported: Around 500 dead bodies of American and British
soldiers killed during military Operation in
Afghanistan
after September ll blitz have been lying in a morgue at Shebhaz Airbase in
Jacobabad. The claim is that the
U.S.
and
U.K.
authorities fearing strong reaction from the people at home built a morgue to
keep them in. The bodies they claim were killed during the last five months in
Afghanistan
and were brought in from Baghram Airbase and other areas of the war-ravaged
country. Sources said American and British authorities, held off on returning
the bodies of the dead soldiers to their own countries after hostilities began
with
Iraq
. Authorities feared that shifting of the bodies at this time would effect the
ongoing campaign of coalition forces in
Iraq
, and would be kept at the Airbase until a final decision is made. They go on to
say security had tightened in and around the Airbase to keep this matter secret;
the report claimed. (*I'm presenting this report as received. I cannot guarantee
its accuracy. If a reader has any information about
this please contact me.)
IRAN
: During my tenure as
Ambassador during the
Iran
war era I learned of the Rockefeller- Kissinger control of the oil and food
production in
Iran
. During that time I met with Sheikh Fisal Alhegelan the Saudi Arabian
Ambassador to the U.S. and tried to convince him that the only way to save the
Mid-East and keep it from complete domination from Israel, was too secretly buy
up the stock of CBS, NBC or ABC. In that way with good thinking Muslims and
Christians running the news, the people of the
U.S.
and other countries would hear the truth and the world could have peace. I
warned him that the Jewish Zionists would never rest until they took over his
country and the entire
Middle East
, unless the people knew the whole truth and be able to see the Zionist lies.
Only then could there ever be peace. He thought Reagan would be elected and all
would change. I am sure he realizes now that I was right. (See "A Chance
Lost" in the website Index)
Iran
The Next Target: I have
maintained for over 20 years that the Zionists will not stop until they control
the world under the same steel fist that they used while they controlled the
Russian peoples under the KGB run government in the
Soviet Union
.
Pakistan
Tribune
3-25-3
claims
The CIA Report they acquired
states: "The next target of the
U.S.
after capturing
Iraq
will be replacement of religious government in
Iran
with a secular government, as the
US
forces in
Afghanistan
have already started implementation on an action plan in that regard. The CIA
had submitted a 300 page report to Pres. Bush in which they pointed out: During
a possible US attack on
Iran
religiously motivated Jehadi (holy warrior) organizations would support
Iran
for the border areas of
Pakistan
and
Afghanistan
. Agencies have started actions to check this possibility of tribal leaders in
any border areas doing so. The report revealed that operations in
Afghanistan
on March 20th were not against Al-Queda *(as was reported to
us by the mass media) but against Hizb-e-Islami and possible supporters of
Iran
. U.S. Intelligence informed U.S State Department of about six organizations
that could support
Iran
. Included on the list of where change in government would
be needed was
Libya
.
I have just been informed Pres.
Bush has announced plans to appoint retired U.S. General Jay Garner
to be the ruler of an occupied
Iraq
. Garner is a Jewish arms manufacturer with a long career in the U.S. Military
and has always been closely connected with the U.S. Zionist Lobby and is a close
friend of Arial Sharon.
Let's not expect our loved ones
in the service home very soon.
Lets look at some of the Bush's Jewish leadership:
Richard Perle, One of Bush's Foreign Policy Advisors and
chairman of the Pentagon's Defense Policy Board, He had worked as Bush's
Jewish national security campaign advisor. A very likely Israeli agent, Perle
was expelled from Sen. Henry Jackson's office in the 1970's after the National
Security Agency (NAS) caught him passing Highly-Classified (National Security)
documents to the Israeli Embassy. He was investigated by the Justice Dept., and
found to have violated US policies relating to unlawful transmission of
sensitive classified
US
information to
Israel
. He just resigned his position with Pres. Bush. He is a close friend of Ariel
Sharon.
Ari Fleischer- Official White House Spokesman, Prominent in Jewish
community, reportedly acknowledges Israeli citizenship.
Paul Wolfowitz- Dep. Defense Secty., Bush's Jewish foreign policy
campaign advisor, close associate of Israeli agent Richard Perle, reportedly has
close ties to the Israeli Military.
Douglas Feith- Under Secty. Of Defense and policy Advisor at the
Pentagon, closely associated with Perle, pro
Israel
extremist, advocated anti-Arab policies, closely associated with the extremist
group, the Zionist Organization of
America which even attacks Jews who do not agree with extremist views.
Elliot Abrams- National Security Council Advisor.
Dov Zekeim- Under Secty. Of Defense, Bush's Jewish foreign policy
advisor. Reportedly acknowledges Israeli citizenship.
Richard Haass- Director of Policy Planning - State Dept. and
Ambassador at large, Director of National Security
Programs.
Robert Zeollick-
US
Trade Rep. A cabinet position, pro-Israel, constantly advocates bombing
Iraq
.
Marc Grossman- Under Scty. Of State for Political Affairs, promoted
from Clinton Administration.)
Robert Satloff-
U.S.
National Security Council Advisor.
Mel Sembler-President of Export-Import Bank of
U.S.
Joshua Bolten- Bush's
Chief Policy Director, active in Jewish organizations. .
Steve Goldsmith-Senior Advisor to the President.
Dan Saul Goldin- Head of
NASA.
Adam Goldman White. House's Special Liaison to the Jewish Community.
Joseph Gildenhorn- Bush's Campaign's Special Liaison to the Jewish
Community.
Mark Weinberger- Assistant
Secty. of the Treasury.
Samuel Bodman- Dep. Secty. of Commerce.
Bonnie Cohen- Under Scty. of State for Management.
Christopher Gersten- former Executive Director of the Republican
Jewish Coalition, husband of Labor Secretary, Linda Chavez, very pro-Israel. Their children are being raised
Jewish.
Ruth Davis Dir. of Foreign Service Institute.
Lincoln
Bloomfield-
Assist. Secty. of State for
Political Military Affairs.
James Schlesinger-Pentagon Advisor, Sits on the Pentagon's Defense
Policy Board, extremist pro-Israel, consistently advocates bombing
Iraq
.
I know I will be receiving the
usual mail with name calling from Zionists but never challenging the accuracy of
what I write, because there can be no argument with facts.
On John Bryant's website he
printed the following which I thinks answers it all rather honestly. I quote:
"If you want to know where the power
lies, then ask whom you cannot criticize." -Kevin Strom & "Anti-Semite
used to mean someone who hates Jews. Now it means someone whom the Jews
hate"
L.A.
Rollins.
I do not nor have I ever hated
all Jew's, I hate Zionist Jews because I recognize them for what they are.
I know they are some of the most
vicious peoples on this earth, and I do not want my children or my grand
children, or yours, under their control and slavery of communism, as were the
people of the
Soviet Union
or other countries they controlled.
BBC TV. By now if you receive it, you know the only slight
chance of getting the news about
Iraq
is on BBC. And you do not get all of it there either. Still it’s the best,
head and shoulders over Fox, NBC, CNN, ABC, etc. Don't get mad at me out there
fellows, you work there and you know it as well as I do. In fact its so much
better, that Israel's three cable TV companies said Sun. 3/3/03 they would drop
the 24-hour news channel BBC World from their systems at the end of March due to
failure to reach an agreement on a new contract. They claim it had nothing to do
with BBC World's coverage of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict that some Israelis
have criticized as biased against
Israel
, which BBC has denied.
As mentioned before wait until
Israel finds out that a retired Colonel on Larry King's show said, the reason we
thought it would be an easy war was that Israel convinced the US government that
the Iraqis would be anxious to lay down their arms when attacked. Will this mean
goodbye CNN in
Israel
too? I have always found BBC to be the best at reporting what they see in
Iraq
of all the controlled media. The best time to see what they carry of Iraqi TV
is at
6:00 AM
daily. Even they cut in sometimes on what the Iraqi Minister of Defense has to
say. By now however, I think everyone should be aware the only way to get the
REAL TRUTH is on the web. Contact me from my website for a listing of those
website's that I feel give the best accurate information. One thing for sure the
Military briefing daily by Brig. Gen. Brooks on TV is strictly propaganda to
show our military might. They will not answer any questions about what
Iraq
is saying or give true figures on our troops lost.
Here is why I say that:
The British have lost 5
journalists so far. If they have 100 journalists there, that is 5%.of the total.
Using the same mathematical calculations if they had 48,000 troops there, then
their troops lost should be about
2,400. And if we have 100,000 troops there than our losses would calculate to be
approximately 5,000. I naturally hope this is a wrong estimate, but how could
reporters be killed and not soldiers with them at the same ratio? Are reporters
just unlucky? If the British have 200 reporters in the field than it is still be
1/2 of those figures.
Desert wait for US Marines:
BBC News
3/30/03
. By David Willis BBC correspondent with US Marines in central
Iraq
reports: "they are stuck in the mud after vicious sandstorms brought their
move on
Baghdad
to a shuddering halt. Hundreds of US Marines may not be moving for several
days. Supply lines are stretched to the limit. "Food right now is one meal
a day until supplies came and we re-supply," says Lance Corporal Juan
Gonzales. Food is not the only problem. These tanks do half a mile to the gallon
and their advance has
outrun their supplies. The convoy is to stop for up to a week while the food and
the fuel, the bullets and the bombs catch them up. And all this while the
Marines have been coming under constant ambush from small but determined groups
of Iraqi fighters. Some of these men have been out in the desert for many weeks
and are keen to get back to family, friends and loved ones. It's a sign of the
nervousness here that a group of Marines opened fire on a civilian vehicle after
hearing what they thought was a gunshot. Later, it emerged that the car had
simply backfired. All three occupants were killed. It is hoped that this massive
convoy will soon be on the move again. The march on
Baghdad
currently on hold." END
Russia
Rules Textbook Critical of Jews Is
Legal: The textbook describes Jews as power hungry and greedy. The
Education Ministry and the Russian Orthodox Church want the book for use in
public schools. In the book it states the Jews forced Pontius Pilate to crucify
Jesus because "they thought only about power over other peoples and earthly
wealth"
Comparative Deaths in the WTC disaster: After having written
that 4,000 Jews were warned not show up on 911 for work at the WTC and only 1
Jew died (who was a visitor from out of state) I received this e-mail from a
reader. "I was thinking about the 4000 Israelis who weren't present at the
WTC, and it occurred to me, has anyone asked how many Arabs were in the WTC when
it was attacked? They have offices there too don't they? It seems to me that if
a large number of Arabs were killed that day in any or the attack sites, it
would really look bad for our "traditional enemies"…wouldn't it?
Anyway, I was hoping you might be able to shed some light on the subject.
Thanks, Tim" Answer: Tim, there were 570
Muslims lost in the attack on the WTC on 911 according to Fox News.
Difference between Jewish people and Zionist Jews, reported by former
Jewish Zionist. All Americans should take the time to read what Naeim
Giladi has to tell you. I have been telling my readers for years what the
Zionists really are; now you can read it from one of their own. This uncovers
the deceit of the Zionists and the bombing and killing of other Jews
indiscriminately to further their aims. Mr. Giladi found he could not get his
book published in
Israel
and even in the
U.S.
he discovered he could do so only if he used his own money. He sold practically
everything he owned to tell the world the TRUTH. You should read the whole
article, the beginning is more of his history. It's a long article but all
Americans should know the true mind-set of the Zionist Jew. To understand
the terror tactics they use go to the center of the article and start at "The
Bombings of 1950-1951".
To read this: 1.
Go to "google" search engine. 2.
Type in Lavon Affair, when that comes up, 3.
Click on "Lavon Affair, Is History
Repeating Itself", This will bring up "What really happened";
scroll to bottom of page. 4.
Click on "New" " The Jews of
Iraq
, this will bring up that article.
Read the whole article , of if you don’t have time, scroll about halfway down
to "The Bombings of 1950-1951" the
story of how the Zionist Jews sacrifice other Jews.
*Sir Peter is an
American Knighted for an "outstanding fight against world communism".
He was promoted to Commander & Brig. Gen. in 1978, served as Ambassador of
the Sovereign Order of St. John 1978-1980, appointed as Chairman of the Ohio
Governor's Export Council to
Central America
in 1982. His
political writings are sent to news services in the
U.S.
and other
countries.
www.tidbitsnews.com
<Please forward this e-mail column to a
friend, group or organization.>
<You also may feel free to print this column and distribute it to
others>
<Donation may be sent to Tidbits,
P.O. Box 268
,
Cuyahoga Falls
,
OH
44222
>
Unsubscribe: If you wish to "Unsubscribe" click on this
e-mail address: editor@tidbitsnews.com
and type in Subject line, "Unsubscribe", and you will be taken off our
e-mail mailing list.